Time: Sun Jul 20 13:35:32 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA22682;
Sun, 20 Jul 1997 13:24:01 -0700 (MST)
id QAA29437; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 16:21:38 -0400 (EDT)
id QAA29394; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 16:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
id AA23799; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 16:21:32 -0400
by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA12247
for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 13:21:29 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 13:21:02 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: Bloomfield Study
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
I would call the librarians at the Rand
Corporation, to see if they can give
you the correct citation. Rand is in
Santa Monica, California state.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 02:14 PM 7/20/97 -0600, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>Does anyone know where I can obtain a full copy of the study referenced
below?
>
>Thanks :)
>
>Jilain
>
>
>"In February 1961, seven months before President Kennedy released the
>FREEDOM FROM WAR plan to the public, his State Department, led by
>Secretary of State Dean Rusk, hired the private Institute for
>Defense Analyses (contract No. SCC 28270) to prepare a study showing
>how disarmament could be employed to lead to world government. On
>March 10, 1962, the Institute delivered Study Memorandum No. 7, A
>WORLD EFFECTIVELY CONTROLLED BY THE UNITED NATIONS, written by Lincoln P.
>Bloomfield. Dr. Bloomfield had himself recently served with the State
>Department's disarmament staff, and while writing his important work was
>serving as an associate professor of political science and director of the
>Arms Control Project at the Center for International Studies, Massachusetts
>Institute of
>Technology.
>
>This Bloomfield/IDA report is especially significant because the
>author is uncharacteristically candid, eschewing the usual euphemisms,
>code words, and double-talk found in typical "world order"
>pronouncements meant for public consumption. The author believed he
>was addressing fellow internationalists in a classified memorandum
>that would never be made available for public scrutiny. So he felt he
>could speak plainly.
>
>Here is the document's opening passage, labeled SUMMARY:
>
> A world effectively controlled by the United Nations is one
> in which "world government" would come about through
> the establishment of supranational institutions,
> characterized by mandatory universal membership and
> some ability to employ physical force. Effective control
> would thus entail a preponderance of political power in the
> hands of a supranational organization... [T]he present UN
> Charter could theoretically be revised in order to erect such
> an organization equal to the task envisaged, thereby
> codifying a radical rearrangement of power in the world.
>
>Dr. Bloomfield was still fudging a little as he began. The phrase
>"some ability to employ physical force" was more than a slight
>understatement, as the bulk of the report makes abundantly clear. He
>continued:
>
> The principal features of a model system would include the
> following: (1) powers sufficient to monitor and enforce
> disarmament, settle disputes, and keep the peace --
> including taxing powers -- with all other powers reserved to
> the nations; (2) an international force, balanced
> appropriately among ground, sea, air, and space elements,
> consisting of 500,000 men, recruited individually, wearing
> a UN uniform, and controlling a nuclear force composed of
> 60-100 mixed land-based mobile and undersea-based
> missiles, averaging one megaton per weapon; (3)
> governmental powers distributed among three branches...;
> (4) compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court...
>
>"The notion of a 'UN-controlled world' is today a fantastic one," the
>professor wrote. "... Political scientists have generally come to
>despair of quantum jumps to world order as utopian and unmindful of
>political realities. But fresh minds from military, scientific, and
>industrial life ... have sometimes found the logic of world government
>-- and it is world government we are discussing here -- inescapable."
>
>
>
> ~~~Tell me not, in mournful numbers,
> Life is but an empty dream!
> For the soul is dead that slumbers,
> And things are not what they seem.~~~
>
>
>====Jilain can be reached via email at jilain@rt66.com
> or via IRC undernet channel #blackvault====
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: Jilain <jilain@rt66.com>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail