Time: Sat Aug 09 10:57:55 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15370;
Sat, 9 Aug 1997 10:41:20 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 13:40:39 -0400
Originator: heritage-l@gate.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
To: pmitch@primenet.com
Subject: Re: SLS:14th Amendment CEASE AND DESIST
>Fine piece of legal jargon, however, would you kindly explain in layman's
>terms in order that we simple country folk are able to understand what it
>is that you are saying?
Here goes (in language which is as simple
as I can make it, after a very difficult and
trying day):
the 14th amendment was never ratified, as proven
by solid historical facts recited by the Utah
Supreme Court in the case of Dyett v. Turner (1968)
section 4 says the validity of the public
shall not be questioned
since #14 never made it into the constitution,
this section is not Law -- no way
more importantly, the attempt to rope everyone
into federal citizenship also failed with this
failed amendment
there are now two classes of citizenship,
and you have a basic Right to choose one,
the other, both, or neither; this is called
the Right of Election in the law books
citizenship is a term which is tied to the land,
and we have two classes of land in America:
the state zone, and the federal zone, corresponding
to the state and federal governments
if you choose federal citizenship, you agree
to be taxed like all other federal citizens,
because you associate yourself with a political
body which is not protected by the constitution
if you choose state Citizenship, you make yourself
a sovereign without subjects, and you cannot be
taxed like federal citizens, because Congress must
"apportion" direct taxes inside the 50 states,
under 2 restrictions in the constitution
if Congress were to "apportion" a direct tax,
then California would pay 10% of that tax,
if California has 10% of the nation's population
there are no apportionment provisions in the
current Internal Revenue Code, anywhere
for this reason, the tax being collected by the
IRS is unlawful, as it is currently imposed on
Citizens of the 50 states
moreover, voter registration affidavits are
a fraud in all 50 states, because you cannot
vote unless you declare, under penalty of
perjury, that you are a federal citizen
jury candidates must also be federal citizens,
and this requirement in state laws causes all
grand and trial juries to be illegal bodies
the federal jury selection Act is likewise
unconstitutional, for requiring that all
jury candidates be federal citizens too,
or they cannot serve on any juries, state or
federal
a major constitutional crisis is now underway,
in large part because of these momentous findings
I hope this helps!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
p.s. Please help yourself to all the documents
in the Supreme Law Library at the URL just below
my name here. See, in particular, "Congresswoman
Suspected of Income Tax Evasion," and "Juries
in Check around the Nation".
At 08:19 PM 8/8/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Fine piece of legal jargon, however, would you kindly explain in layman's
>terms in order that we simple country folk are able to understand what it
>is that you are saying?
>
>Many thanks,
>brjamj860@worldnet.att.net
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail