Time: Fri Aug 22 10:38:47 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02003;
Fri, 22 Aug 1997 09:14:03 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 12:13:54 -0400
Originator: heritage-l@gate.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
To: pmitch@primenet.com
Subject: SLF: demand to Morrison & Heckler, Phoenix
<snip>
>
>Subject: SLF: demand to Morrison & Heckler
>
>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>MEMO
>
>TO: John Oppedahl, CEO, Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
> and
> Frank G. Long, Unregistered Foreign Agent
> Morrison & Hecker, L.L.P., Attorneys at Law
> 2800 North Central Avenue, Suite 1600
> Phoenix 85004-1047/tdc
> ARIZONA STATE
> tel: (602) 279-1600
> fax: (602) 240-6925
>
>FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
> Counselor at Law
>
>DATE: August 21, 1997
>
>SUBJECT: Please Turn Off the Pressure!
>
> PRELIMINARY COMPLAINT OF ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE
>
>Dear Frank:
>
>I have received your fax communication yesterday. I honestly do
>not agree with you when you say that it is "essential" that I
>sign your proposed Settlement Agreement by Friday noon (i.e.
>tomorrow). Since I have not even read it, I am not in any
>position to cite provisions which justify such haste. Your
>"deadline" is artificial and contrived, at best.
>
>You are quite wrong to conclude that I am not serious about
>resolving our "dispute" amicably. On the contrary, I have
>already gone way out of my way to explain our situation, and to
>take steps to ensure that your position is also recognized. If
>what you say is true (and it is not true), I would not have taken
>the initiative to begin editing our huge database in honor of
>your request.
>
>I fail to see where such excessive pressure tactics are going to
>get you what you want, unless there is, indeed, some real hidden
>agenda grounding your intentions.
>
>What are your true and complete intentions, Mr. Long?
>
>Is it the original Thirteenth Amendment?
>
>Is it the all important difference between the USDC and the DCUS?
>
>Are you, in fact, colluding with staff of the federal judiciary
>in Phoenix and/or Tucson, and with the Pima County Attorneys
>office in Tucson, to impede, halt, obstruct, or compromise the
>services we are obligated to deliver to our clients?
>
>If you are, then you may be putting yourself in a position of
>liability for obstructing justice. But, as a licensed attorney,
>you don't need me to be telling you these things, do you?
>
>I can honestly say to you that I have already made major
>commitments to more than one client, to complete their work as
>soon as possible, and hopefully before the end of the business
>day on Friday (tomorrow). In light of their paramount needs, I
>worked all last weekend on the editing which I have already
>described to you. This good faith on my part is, evidently, just
>not enough for you. This saddens me deeply.
>
>If you persist in pressuring me in the way that you have
>yesterday, I would have to regard such pressure as an attempt by
>you deliberately to impede the delivery of essential professional
>services to clients who are facing imminent incarceration, by the
>same hostile federal judiciary with which you appear to be
>colluding and conspiring. Is this only an appearance, Mr. Long,
>or are you in fact colluding with the offices of Mr. Richard H.
>Weare in Phoenix and Tucson, and with the office of the Pima
>County Attorney in Tucson?
>
>You do not have any right to impair the obligations of my prior
>contracts, in particular because all licensed attorneys, as
>officers of the courts in which they are admitted to practice,
>must be able to demonstrate that they have taken an oath to
>support the U.S. Constitution. Have you? I have no contract
>with you or Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., verbal or written, at this
>point in time; and, furthermore, if you do not immediately begin
>to demonstrate at least a gram of professional consideration for
>my prior commitments and obligations, I will take your refusal in
>this regard as seriously as possible.
>
>My clients have a fundamental Right to counsel of their choice,
>under the Sixth Amendment, and you now given me cause to conclude
>that you are more than willing to interfere with my priorities
>and obligations to these clients. This is a violation of their
>fundamental right to effective assistance of Counsel and, as
>such, it constitutes probable cause to charge you with violating
>18 U.S.C. 242 -- deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of
>law -- and possibly also 18 U.S.C. 241 -- conspiracy to deprive
>fundamental Rights. This is a fair gentleman's warning to you,
>Mr. Long.
>
>Since you have failed to demonstrate any specific reason why your
>artificial deadline warrants a total upheaval in my crowded and
>pressing schedule, I must politely demand hereby that you
>immediately cease and desist any further pressure tactics. I
>think you know exactly what I am talking about here. I certainly
>hope that you don't make a habit of such unethical behavior.
>
>If you do not understand exactly what I am talking about here,
>please advise in writing, and I will elaborate in excruciating
>detail, but only after my other pressing obligations are met, in
>a timely and professional manner.
>
>I will look forward to your immediate cooperation in this regard.
>Please fax me evidence of your oath of office, no later than noon
>on Monday next (August 25, 1997). That gives you the whole
>weekend to locate it. If you do not, I will proceed on the basis
>of probable cause that you are not who you say you are, and that
>you fully intend to continue, and to foster, a program of
>intentional harassment, misrepresentation, and retaliation
>against a known federal witness, in deliberate and premeditated
>violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512 & 1513. Again, you have been warned.
>
>Thank you for obeying American Law never repealed. I really
>don't want to fight with you, Mr. Long, but I will fight if I
>must and if you give me no other alternative.
>
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>Counselor at Law and federal witness
>c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
>Tucson 85719/tdc
>ARIZONA STATE (See USPS Publication #221.)
>
>email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.3(16):
> preferred, to conserve all resources)
>phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line:
> please get permission to disclose)
>fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy:
> available 24-hours per day or night)
>fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (switched fax/modem:
> use when fax machine is busy/no answer)
>website: http://www.supremelaw.com
>
>copies: Better Business Bureau of Phoenix, Arizona
> State Bar of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
>
>
> # # #
>
<snip>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail