Time: Fri Aug 22 05:35:29 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA16126
for [address in tool bar]; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 21:50:43 -0700 (MST)
From: pmitch@primenet.com
Date: 21 Aug 97 23:45:52 -5:00
Subject: SLF: "Missing" children photos at IRS office
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SCV Echo <scvecho@dixie-net.com>
*************************************************
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 23:01:40 -0500
To: scvecho@dixie-net.com
From: pmitch@primenet.com
Subject: SLF: "Missing" children photos at IRS office
<snip>
>
>It was not a good day for the conspiracy
>in Tucson, my friend. I hand-delivered the
>criminal complaint to DOJ and to the Arizona
>AG's office. As I headed back towards
>my car from the AG's office, I had to
>walk right in front of the IRS office.
>So, since I had an envelope for one of
>the accused already in my briefcase,
>rather than mail it, I hand-delivered it
>to their public counter.
>
>Metal detectors are always fun for me,
>because the metal support in these shoes
>I got, as a gift, always sets off the
>court metal detector. So, I use it as a
>chance to joke with the guard, and
>take bets whether or not the shoes
>will give me away, once again. This
>time, however, their detector did not
>pick up the shoes, even though the
>Superior Court detector does so
>every time. Does this say anything,
>or not? Probably not. Read on:
>
>After clearing the X-ray machine and
>putting my buckle back on, a free standing
>marquis caught my attention: it had the
>photos of 7 or 8 young children, ages
>5 to 8, or so. Each had been photographed
>like a WANTED poster, and each had the
>words "MISSING" over their heads. Each child
>a unique beauty, now gone, probably forever.
>
>After what you told me, I grew steadily
>more angry. Here, in the downtown federal
>building in Tucson, they have the gall to
>make it look like they do care so much [sic]
>for the children. But, of course, it is
>all a big deception, like the IRS itself.
>These photos were proof positive to me
>that there were people in that building
>who knew full well what had likely happened
>to those little people.
>
>"What will you give for a nice new liver
>donation? $50,000? How about $75,000?
>We will be happy to lien on your life
>insurance, or your stock portfolio.
>You get the money, and we'll get the
>organ. When do you need it?"
>
>Or something like that ...
>
>I went from there, to the Post Office,
>where all the counter clerks know me
>very well by now. I went to the far
>end, where smiling Rosie was working
>today. She always asks what's going on,
>so I told her. This cold, clammy look
>came over her normally bright face, and
>then I began to weep, dropping my head into
>my hands, as I told her the conspiracy is
>harvesting healthy organs from kidnapped
>children, right after killing them.
>
>Rosie let me stand there, as the rest
>of the Post Office became suddenly
>quiet and still, as I shed my tears, out loud,
>onto her clean and well ordered counter.
>We fumbled together with stamps and money
>orders and envelopes and receipts and did
>absolutely everything wrong.
>
>I even went out the "in", and heard Rick's
>voice reminding me about the other door.
>He was the only one saying anything, at that
>particular moment.
>
>It was not a good day for the conspiracy.
>
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>http://www.supremelaw.com
>
>
>
>At 07:09 PM 8/21/97 -0400, you wrote:
>>The Attorney stated that any more letters to the Publisher would be
>>taken as Harassment, but what about the News Desk of the competition?
>>
>>Think they would love to hear about a scam or patent attorney kick some
>>poor teacher around, because he signed his letters with Arizona Republic?
>>
>>How asinine!
>>
>>Just moving a little slow on this today, that's all. My nature is to jump
>>into the ring and kick ass, but I guess I am maturing, or something.
>>
>>I WILL do anything I can, to help you, Paul!
>>
>>I agreed to call him, but I want to be sure of my tenor and statement;
>>perhaps a letter from me, the "Federal Witness," would carry more weight,
>>but of course then they have a piece of evidence too? What do you
>>think?
>
<snip>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail