Time: Tue Aug 26 20:19:53 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA20679;
Tue, 26 Aug 1997 20:20:32 -0700 (MST)
id XAA22859; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 23:17:48 -0400 (EDT)
id XAA22846; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 23:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
id AA15022; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 23:17:43 -0400
by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA29514
for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 20:17:40 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 20:16:11 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: SLS: Universal Declaration of Human Rights
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
How did you come to "understand" this?
Confer at "Declaration of Independence"
in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
(with pronunciations).
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 10:51 PM 8/26/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>As I understand it, The Declaration of Independance "holds no weight of law".
> Please correct me if I am wrong and give ref.
>
>rod
>---------------------
>Forwarded message:
>From: pmitch@primenet.com (Paul Andrew Mitchell)
>Reply-to: snetnews@world.std.com
>Date: 97-08-21 17:07:02 EDT
>
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>The treaties do not and cannot "grant"
>rights here in America, because these treaties
>are designed to reinforce and bolster
>the fundamental Rights which are recognized
>by our local constitutions. Our several
>constitutions already recognize the Source
>of our rights, and that Source is not our
>governments. Read the Declaration of
>Independence, for proof. There is nothing
>in these treaties which could ever be construed
>to override, or supersede, this Declaration.
>
>In other nations of the world, their governments
>may, in fact, be recognized as the "source" of
>their human rights, but not here! That was the
>unique situation which motivated Congress to
>attach these explicit reservations in the first
>place.
>
>Take, for example, the obligation that
>states party to the treaties will take steps
>to guarantee "effective judicial remedies" [sic], and
>to develop the "possibilities of effective
>judicial remedies". There is nothing in such a
>goal which would impair or impede the magnificent
>body of law which has evolved from the due process
>clause in our Fifth Amendment. It is very easy
>to demonstrate that the U.S. has failed miserably,
>for neglecting to develop the possibilities of
>effective judicial remedies; on the contrary,
>they are now actively obstructing a well conceived,
>and properly filed, challenge to the constitutionality
>of our federal and state jury selection processes.
>See Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF in the Supreme Law
>Library for evidence proof positive.
>
>That, right there, is probable cause to sue the
>U.S. in the local county courts, for obstructing
>and impeding effective judicial remedies, and to
>compel them, via Mandamus, to get their house in
>order, or find themselves in contempt of court,
>and possibly also prison, until and unless they
>start to obey the supreme Law of this Land.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>http://www.supremelaw.com
>
>copy: Supreme Law School
>
>
>
>
>At 05:29 PM 8/20/97 PST, you wrote:
>> <I think this gives the human Rights treaties much more importance
>> than they have enjoyed hitherto.
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://www.supremelaw.com>
>>
>> Not really. There is no such thing as "Human Rights".
>>
>> These treaties simpy grant PRIVLEGES, not rights. For Rights are
>> inalienable, meaning they cannot be rescinded, rejected, nor taken
>> away. Priveleges are granted by governments (treaties, UN shit,
>> etc.). Since they are granted by government, they can be taken away
>> by government.
>>
>> Since the UN is, fundamentally, an atheist organization, the "human
>> rights" they speak of are nothing more than government granted
>> priveleges. There is no freedom whatsoever under any UN treaty, nor
>> can any rights be granted nor abridged by Treaty.
>>
>> Treaties and Rights have nothing to do with each other.
>>
>> Treaties are agreements between governments. Rights are a gift of
>> Divine Providence.
>>
>> cordially,
>>
>>
>> Dan Terry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
>>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
>>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
>>
>>
>
>========================================================================
>Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>
>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
>website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>
>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>========================================================================
>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: RAmes0@aol.com
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail