Time: Tue Sep 30 16:28:40 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA27791;
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 16:23:16 -0700 (MST)
by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA16030;
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 16:06:31 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 16:06:02 -0700
To: "Anderson, Toney" <Toney.Anderson@PSS.Boeing.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Karl Kleinpaste
Cc: Karl Kleinpaste <karl@jprc.com>
ing.com>
At 02:59 PM 9/30/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Paul, I read over Karl's case and when I got to the MFF and CL, I
>couldn't help but think the 'style' of that motion is what I had seen in
>Gilbertson in the SL Library. When I went to the e-mail from which I got
>the URL for Karl's case I saw that it originated from you.
Hi Toney,
You are a keen investigator. We have been
doing our best to keep my name out of this
case. I congratulate you, Sherlock Holmes!
>
>I do not know how you are connected to Karl's case but I am very glad
>you are. I have a deep regard for your legal knowledge and thoroughness,
>and I sincerely hope you prevail.
Thanks. We appreciate your kindness here.
Karl has now opened Pandora's Box, and he is
just now beginning to realize what that means,
in practical terms. If DOJ were in the boxing
ring right now, they would be kicking Karl
below the belt, with razor blades imbedded
in jack boots. As the entire world is now
beginning to realize, "federal" means "feudal."
>
>I told Karl that it seems like the judge doesn't really have a clue and
>is being manipulated by the DOJ attorneys.
This is another keen observation on your part.
I feel sorry for this judge. She may also have
a gun to her head, bluntly or not so bluntly.
That is the only excuse I can
>come up with for her motions given the facts and the rebuttals - not to
>mention the specious arguments given by the DOJ attorneys in their brief
>to dismiss.
I may be wrong here, but I think this is the
first case in which the litigant(s) have formally
broken any legal connections which DOJ claims
to have with the IRS. Of course, DOJ has
Power of Attorney to "represent" U.S. officials,
but their absence from Title 31 proves that IRS
employees are not "U.S. officials." Moreover,
Clarke's failure to produce credentials, proves
that he does not occupy the office of U.S. Attorney.
The conclusions are rather obvious, then, that
NONE of the named defendants has yet appeared,
and yet the judge wants to dismiss WITH PREJUDICE
Karl's entire case. The failure to appear is
more appropriately grounds for default judgment,
in favor of Karl!!
If anything, the judge should dismiss the case
as to defendant United States, and bifurcate the case
on grounds of sovereign immunity, by continuing
to proceed against IRS and Chafin. This would
be an acceptable compromise for Karl, and I think
it would further sever the link between the
United States and the IRS. The writing would
surely be on the wall then, don't you agree?
Namely, IRS is NOT a federal government agency.
>
>Anyway, (Karl's and) your fight will benefit thousands of us who are
>considering a similar path. Thank you!!
When I got into Karl's case, I saw it as
a prime opportunity to mount a powerful
collateral attack against the IRS, one
from which they would never recover.
It was always my intent to develop arguments
which thousands of others could also use.
I think we have accomplished at least that
much.
I frankly think this case now belongs at
the Circuit Court of Appeals, during which
time Karl can have a field day on the Internet,
exploring the real implications of what has already
transpired in the case. It surely deserves a lot
of careful scrutiny and open discussion. The
Internet has been a bona fide gift from the
Most High, if only for reasons like this!
I have been dreaming for a long time of posting
all important pleadings in an open forum, like this,
so that they don't continue to get buried in the
offices of court clerks, never to be seen ever again.
Karl had the terrific foresight to post all of his
work, and all responses, from the outset. This was
a brilliant move on his part.
Karl should, therefore, be congratulated for
coming this far. It takes a certain amount
of raw courage to stay in the saddle, at a
time like this. The IRS is an extortion racket,
after all, and this means terrorism, unexpected
and unprincipled.
On behalf of Karl and myself, we both appreciate
your kindness and thoughtfulness. He would also
welcome any amount of financial support you can
contribute, no matter how small. Litigation is
expensive, even when we do our best to minimize
the costs.
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this entire
message to the Supreme Law School. They do enjoy
following such developments, as closely, and as
promptly, as they occur.
God bless you and yours, always and every way.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
copy: Karl Kleinpaste, Supreme Law School
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
:
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
_____________________________________:
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail