Time: Tue Aug 05 06:58:22 1997
by usr10.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA09216;
Tue, 5 Aug 1997 05:00:03 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 04:59:12 -0700
To: "dale robertson" <dalerobertson@hotmail.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: I keep getting these gems. Do you think that we can
putsomething together and run with this? Marty
Title 18, United States Code
Chapter 73 -- Obstruction of Justice
1504. Influencing juror by writing
"Whoever attempts to influence the action of
decision of any grand or petit jury .... etc.
"Nothing in this section shall be construed to <---!!!!!
prohibit the communication of a request to
appear before the grand jury."
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 12:31 AM 8/5/97 PDT, you wrote:
>Paul:
>
>
>Forward of the below - - - FYI.
>
>Dale
>
>=========================================
>
>>From banthebar@juno.com Mon Aug 4 14:00:33 1997
>> by m5.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id QAS15481; Mon, 04 Aug 1997
>16:55:45 EDT
>>To: pact@juno.com
>>Cc: amourad@carroll.com, tony@metronet.com, loublain@ix.netcom.com,
>> Borisd@aol.com, ironstone@pipeline.com, rkatz1@idt.net,
>> jlkucek@juno.com, jpapania@asu.campus.mci.net,
>> dalerobertson@hotmail.com
>>Subject: Re: I keep getting these gems. Do you think that we can put
>> something together and run with this? Marty
>>Message-ID: <19970804.164006.4271.0.banthebar@juno.com>
>>References: <19970803.012940.8103.4.pact@juno.com>
>>From: banthebar@juno.com (Jim Hallas)
>>Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1997 16:55:45 EDT
>>
>> I WOULD FIRST LIKE TO KNOW WHAT MITCHELL'S QUALIFICATIONS ARE FOR
>>CORRESPONDING WITH THE GRAND JURY FOREPERSON - IF ANY ARE NECESSARY. I
>>WOULD ALSO LIKE TO KNOW HOW TO GET THE FOREPERSON'S NAME. I SUPPOSE
>>FOLLOWING HIS APPROACH COULD BUILD ADDITIONAL CASES, IN SOME OF OUR
>>CIRCUMSTANCES, FOR ENABLING THEM TO GROW THEIR OWN CONSPIRACY CHARGES
>>AGAINST THEMSELVES (THE NEW ISSUES WHICH TAKE ON THEIR OWN LIFE).
>>COMPILING A DOSSIER OF CONSPIRACIES (ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA OF MAIL
>>CRIMES) WOULD CERTAINLY PUT FEDERAL PRESSURE ON THE STATE COURTS TO LET
>>DOWN THE DRAWBRIDGE TO THEIR FORTRESS - AT LEAST ENOUGH TO BYPASS THE
>>CORRUPT PROCECUTORS.
>>
>>ON ANOTHER SUBJECT - M.V.:
>>SOME OF US KEEP USING LANGUAGE TO THE EFFECT OF "WHERE DID THE POLICE
>>OFFICER GET THE POWER TO ISSUE OR EXECUTE CIVIL PROCESS, IN VIOLATION
>OF
>>NJS 40A:14-152. THEY NEVER CLAIM THAT TRAFFIC TICKETS ARE "CIVIL
>>PROCESS" (PROBABLY BECAUSE TRAFFIC TICKETS AREN'T JUDICIAL PROCESS AT
>>ALL).
>>40A:14-152 SAYS THAT THEY CAN'T "ISSUE OR EXECUTE PROCESS ARISING FROM
>>`CIVIL CAUSES' ". SINCE THE DMV CLAIMS THAT ALTHOUGH T39 IS CIVIL, IT
>IS
>>PROSECUTED CRIMINALLY (REFER TO NJ CONST. ARTICLE 1 SECT. 10, WHICH
>SAYS
>>THAT ALL [EMPHASIS ADDED] CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS SHALL BE BY JURY -
>>NEVER MIND IN RE LIVOLSI AND RETAINED RIGHTS. ALL MEANS ALL.
>>BUT THEN AGAIN - WHEN DO THEY EVER FOLLOW THE LAW THEY TOOK AN OATH TO
>>UPHOLD.
>>THE QUESTION NEEDS TO BE PHRASED " WHERE DID THE OFFICER GET THE POWER
>>TO ISSUE AND EXECUTE PROCESS ARIZING FROM A CIVIL CAUSE, IN VIOLATION
>OF
>>NJS 40A:14-152."
>>
>>On Sun, 03 Aug 1997 01:34:10 EDT pact@juno.com (People Against
>Corruption
>>& Tyranny) writes:
>>>From: DAVE RYDEL <eagleflt@thumb.net>
>>>>Subject: SLF: Paul Mitchell's FBI contacts
>>>>
>>>>Dear Friends and Clients,
>>>>
>>>>I hereby publicize the FBI contacts
>>>>which I have in my database. For the
>>>>record, I have never had any telephone
>>>>or personal contacts with these people.
>>>>
>>>>Their names came to me when their office
>>>>responded to evidence which I sent to them
>>>>of federal judicial corruption in Arizona.
>>>>
>>>>I think the letter speaks for itself.
>>>>
>>>>For more background material, please read
>>>>"The Kick-Back Racket" in the Supreme Law
>>>>Library at the URL right below my name here.
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>http://www.supremelaw.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>>>
>>>> c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
>>>> Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>>> ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>>>>
>>>> September 13, 1996
>>>>
>>>>Mr. Thomas H. Basham
>>>>Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
>>>>Federal Bureau of Investigation
>>>>U.S. Department of Justice
>>>>201 East Indianola
>>>>Phoenix, Arizona 85012/tdc
>>>>
>>>>Subject: Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll,
>>>> United States District Court, Tucson
>>>>
>>>>Dear Mr. Basham:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for your letter to Me, dated September
>>>>9, 1996, concerning alleged criminal misconduct by a Federal
>>>>District Court Judge in Tucson, Arizona.
>>>>
>>>> In your letter, you stated that My letter to the FBI does
>>>>not contain sufficient detail to determine whether a criminal
>>>>investigation is warranted. You also requested that I submit, to
>>>>the Tucson office of the FBI, further documentation of the
>>>>alleged misconduct, to include names, dates, and any other facts
>>>>that may be pertinent. To this end, enclosed please find all the
>>>>pertinent materials currently in My possession and control.
>>>>
>>>> The thread of evidence you should follow concerns the events
>>>>which occurred immediately after a federal grand jury subpoena
>>>>was first served on New Life Health Center Company in Tucson,
>>>>Arizona state ("New Life"). Pay particular attention to the fate
>>>>of all the U.S. Mail which We transmitted directly to the grand
>>>>jury Foreperson in response to their subpoena.
>>>>
>>>> I was retained by New Life at that time to answer the
>>>>subpoena (see enclosed PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, dated March 20,
>>>>1996) and to assist New Life with their civil defense. This
>>>>PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was mailed to the Grand Jury Foreperson
>>>>via Registered U.S. Mail, return receipt and restricted delivery
>>>>both requested. The enclosed evidence will show that this
>>>>PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was illegally intercepted by John M.
>>>>Roll, who handed it to Robert L. Miskell in the office of the
>>>>United States Attorney in Tucson.
>>>>
>>>> After investigating on Our own, and with the able assistance
>>>>of the Postmaster, We decided to prepare and mail a FORMAL
>>>>REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION to the same federal grand jury. This
>>>>request was mailed to the Foreperson on April 28, 1996 (see
>>>>enclosed). This FORMAL REQUEST was also intercepted by John M.
>>>>Roll, who also handed it to Robert L. Miskell. We have reason to
>>>>believe that the federal grand jury never saw this FORMAL REQUEST
>>>>either.
>>>>
>>>> At a subsequent hearing on the matter, John M. Roll
>>>>admitted, on the official court record, that he had intercepted
>>>>this FORMAL REQUEST. He also said that he had not opened it, but
>>>>that he had given it to Robert L. Miskell. At that same hearing,
>>>>Robert L. Miskell admitted, on record, that he had received this
>>>>FORMAL REQUEST from John M. Roll, and that the mail in question
>>>>simply contained a formal request that the federal grand jury
>>>>investigate possible violations of federal law by Robert L.
>>>>Miskell. We inferred from Miskell's comments that he had,
>>>>indeed, opened this mail, because he was correct about its
>>>>contents.
>>>>
>>>> At this point, We felt it was necessary to place the
>>>>Foreperson of the federal grand jury on the Proof of Service list
>>>>for all subsequent pleadings which We planned to file in that
>>>>case. All together, some twenty-five (25) different pleadings
>>>>were then filed under My signature, or under signatures of Mine
>>>>and Dr. Eugene A. Burns. Some of these pleadings are affidavits.
>>>>All pleadings currently in My possession and control are
>>>>enclosed, for your review.
>>>>
>>>> Counting all 25 pleadings, the PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
>>>>(26), and the FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION (27), none of
>>>>which were ever delivered to the federal grand jury Foreperson to
>>>>whom they were mailed, We count 27 counts of mail fraud, 27
>>>>counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice,
>>>>and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed
>>>>by a conspiracy of persons including, but not limited to, John M.
>>>>Roll, Janet Napolitano, Robert L. Miskell, and Evangelina
>>>>Cardenas. Other likely accessories to these crimes include
>>>>Robert A. Johnson, Robert H. Weare, and William M. McCool.
>>>>
>>>> At another hearing on the matter, John M. Roll complained
>>>>that he had some 14 inches of pleadings to read in this case.
>>>>But then, he immediately called a recess, and huddled for quite
>>>>some time with his staff, both inside and outside the courtroom.
>>>>When he came back into session, John M. Roll qualified his
>>>>earlier statement by saying that he really had only 6 or 7 inches
>>>>of pleadings in this case, but that he guaranteed, if We had
>>>>filed them, he had read them. This statement was witnessed by Me
>>>>and by My assistant Counsel, Neil Thomas Nordbrock, who is also a
>>>>federal witness to perjury of oath by Robert L. Miskell in
>>>>another case. Neil Nordbrock and I took his qualification to
>>>>mean that John M. Roll had, in fact, intercepted all 25 pleadings
>>>>which We had mailed to the grand jury Foreperson. You can
>>>>measure their thickness yourself.
>>>>
>>>> I hope this response to your letter is satisfactory. If you
>>>>should need any additional information, permit Me to recommend
>>>>that you first contact Dr. Eugene A. Burns, Managing Director of
>>>>New Life Health Center Company, 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27,
>>>>Tucson, Arizona state. As of the moment I vacated the premises
>>>>at New Life, Dr. Burns was in possession and control of all the
>>>>documentary exhibits which were attached to the enclosed
>>>>pleadings. These documentary exhibits include, for example, the
>>>>Postmaster's response to our FOIA request for a certified copy of
>>>>the Standing Delivery Order (USPS Form 3801) signed by the
>>>>federal grand jury Foreperson in the New Life case. This
>>>>response stated that there was no such document in existence,
>>>>proving that the Foreperson had never authorized anyone else to
>>>>accept or sign for U.S. Mail addressed to him/her.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for your consideration.
>>>>
>>>> VERIFICATION
>>>>
>>>> I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona
>>>>state and federal witness, hereby verify, under penalty of
>>>>perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without
>>>>the "United States," that the above statements of fact are true,
>>>>correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of My current
>>>>information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to
>>>>28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
>>>>
>>>>Further Affiant sayeth naught.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Respectfully submitted,
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>attachments: to FBI, Tucson
>>>>
>>>>copy: Bruce J. Gebhardt
>>>> Special Agent in Charge
>>>>
>>>>copy: Thomas H. Basham
>>>> Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
>>>> c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation
>>>> 1 South Church Avenue, Suite 600
>>>> Tucson, Arizona state 85701/tdc
>>>>
>>>>copy: Postmaster
>>>> U.S. Post Office
>>>> Downtown Station
>>>> Tucson, Arizona
>>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail