Time: Mon Sep 15 04:52:23 1997
by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA24659
for [address in toolbar]; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 04:20:59 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 04:20:42 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Mr. Johnson,
I have noticed that you are using someone else's
email address, until further notice.
I am meeting with Mr. Jack McLamb next week,
and we will be discussing the matter of missing
children. I asked Nancy Lord to brief him,
after a meeting she had with me several months
ago. To my knowledge, she did not. She made
a point of discouraging me from pursuing the
grand jury case which is now posted in the
Supreme Law Library. Since then, she has had
absolutely no contact with me. It would help
me to know why she has chosen to fall silent
in this matter. The tragedies in Nebraska,
then in Belgium, provide leads which terminate
in Tucson, Arizona. Bluntly, there is an
active traffic in live organs, which are
surgically removed from murdered children.
If you can provide me with any information
which could be helpful to Jack McLamb and to
myself, we would both appreciate it very much.
Please share this message with Nancy Lord.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
copies: off-site archivists
At 10:58 PM 9/14/97 -0700, you wrote:
>The Constitutional Crossroads
>(c)1997 By J.J. Johnson
>
>
>With all the various issues facing Americans today, there is a growing
>feeling that some type of negative reaction to government authority is
>imminent, if not necessary. True, as the current Administration's, as well
>as their political subdivision's blatant disregard for Constitutional and
>even Statute Law has become obvious in today's society, many believe that we
>as like-minded Americans' lack of cohesiveness may prove to be our
>destruction, by our inability to reach a consensus on implementing any
>course of action.
>
>There are those among us who no longer ask "Where to we draw the line?", or
>"What can we do to stop them?". They now ask, "How can we now prevail over
>the obvious?"
>
>Today, this is a fair question. I for one will never admit to having all the
>answers. But perhaps now is the time for those with sound workable solutions
>to step forward, to lead, follow, or get out of the way. People willing to
>place principles before personalities. People willing to take the risks. To
>put it bluntly, what is needed is leadership.
>
>The time and ability to educate the public at large will end. Public
>officials are now taking steps (and their minions are actively working) to
>eliminate any voice of opposition to their authority. It has gone far beyond
>the Second Amendment. The First Amendment has become the latest victim of
>the government's thirst for power. We will soon be left without any regard
>for the Constitution, but the mere crumbs...a few lines from the Declaration
>of Independence.
>
>Although we have many differences among us, we now have a common thread
>which bonds all of us. We must now hold this truth to be self evident: We
>have all become criminals. Not by our actions, nor by our speech, but by our
>thoughts; by the foundations to which we base our most scared principles.
>
>We are at the Crossroads. Whatever must be done by the Constitutionalists,
>the actions and policies of government will force us into action. Then we
>will be left with the reality of only three choices: Submit, Fight, or Flee.
>
>For most of us, submission is out of the question. Fighting this leviathan
>now would be an even greater disaster, due to lack of quality manpower,
>resources, and on-sight intelligence necessary to effectively neutralize the
>threat as a whole. There is also the fear of what type of government would
>replace the one in existence today, after a long, costly, and bloody battle.
>
>...Regrettably, I have come to the conclusion that true Constitutional
>Governace cannot and will not be allowed to exist in today's society... And
>we must take a serious look at the last option. There is no political
>solution. No one wants to admit it, but recognizing a problem is the first
>step to solving it.
>
>To escape or "flee" would mean to surrender to many. But as I have been
>blessed to see a great part of this nation, I believe we have the ability to
>"break the chains" of society; the chains that chain us to ourselves, and
>live in the wilderness of the land, leaving the materialistic "spoils of
>war", to the enemy and the lost souls, and create an "America". Not a New
>America, nor and Old America, but a *Real* America.
>
>This is not a a call for revelotion, but a Resolution. I speak only of a
>revolution of the heart, and of the mind, where each man and eah woman
>breaks, with passionate understanding, from the yoke, the modern-day false
>sense of securty that has been placed upon them. The lifestyle socialistic
>tolerance we have adjusted to.
>
>This concept on it's surface will undoubtedly cause controversy among us.
>Let me make this clear: This is not surrender. This is a concept of
>"redefining the battlefield". Our victory will not be won by destroying the
>benevolent, but by our ability to "survive" and live free without their
>benevolence. The wilderness that I speak of is not merely the forests ladden
>mountians of Idaho, the fruited plains of Indiana, or the barren wastelands
>of Nevada. This "wilderness" that I speak is in fact, everywhere.
>
>The tyranny and oppression we fight against has become inter-woven into
>society. Yet most of us refuse to reject it. We fear the alternative. Why do
>we stay chained to our desks, our job sites, or the government? For
>convenience? To feed the machine? To be productive in a service-orientated
>economy, and punished for it every April 15th and terrorized four days
>later? To raise our children so they can work to continue to feed this
>beast? What possessions do we really own that makes it worth being a slave;
>soon to be forced to take a mark on the forehead or the hand?
>
>Ladies and gentlemen...Constitutionalists... and huddled masses yearning to
>be free, please consider:
>
>We can be Free! We are the enemies of the government because we are the one
>possession in the world that they cannot have. They *need* us. We feed them.
>We care for them when they are sick. We chauffeur them. We entertain them.
>We justify their reason to take liberty away from the masses, preserving it
>only for themselves. We are the writers, the builders, the thinkers, the
>managers, the producers for masters who produce nothing and feel their right
>to govern us surpasses our right to exist.
>
>Why do we trade freedom, liberty and justice away for the luxury of
>convenience? How much time do we spend working to pay for our own
>destruction? I for one would take the dirt, the cold, the tired muscles, and
>the cuts and bruises as a reward to keep what I earn and to help set my
>people free.
>
>Would you be willing to give your blood, sweat and tears, and trade your
>"convenience" for just one chance to give a Free Republic to your
descendants?
>
>I say, it's time to take the "convenience" out of their hands. If we believe
>there is a God Almighty, then we must begin to take our hands off the
>"machine", depend on our Creator to "part the waters" while we journey to a
>safer haven. Once we arrive, we must build an alternative "Bridge to the
>21st century"; one that will be free of government control; built on a soild
>rock foundation, not a brige of lies and empty promises; one that more and
>more Americans will cross when they realize that they too, have become
>enemies of the government. When the majority of the American public sees the
>"Book of Revelation" politics on the evening news, then we must not preach
>to them. We must not teach to them. We must reach for them. We should have a
>well-lit path already built for their exodus.
>
>A "Constitutional Exodus" sounds like an unrealistic, if not frightening
>concept. Even the thought of myself jumping on to a freight train (or
>hitch-hiking by truck), and leaving the metropolitan area to re-settle in
>the wild gives me nightmares. Alone in the elements, most of us would starve
>or surrender in a matter of days. Many of us may die. But in this case, we
>would have a reason to live. We would have a reason to *want* to live.
>
>Nature has always provided the means for man to survive in the wild. With
>today's technology and the knowledge that we all possess, we can build and
>maintain a communication network that could ensure that we would have the
>knowledge at our disposal to survive, and we would never be alone. We would
>be...among our fellow Americans, even if we were separated by miles of
terrain.
>
>This exodus cannot be an act of desperation. Nor can it be done overnight,
>or even in a matter of weeks. It will take years. Our journey must begin
>long before we ever leave. This exodus goes far beyond the mere rescinding
>of a Social Security Number, becoming a sovereign citizen, or joining
>underground cell groups for covert operations against UN soldiers. I propose
>a complete, yet slow and systematic physical (and mental) withdrawal from
>the society that the government wishes to control. Yes, a long term plan of
>disengagement from the slavemaster. A de-centralization of the populace. We
>truly have only our faith, wisdom, knowledge, to leads us. It will take
>preparation.
>
>If we can build the type of society we truly desire, it's torch light will
>shine out to the other "huddled masses" yearning to be free. Yes, they will
>come. There will be no need to call for them. If the ministers, priests,
>rabbis, clerics, etc. are worth their salt, they will lead their flocks, out
>also. They too will soon become part of the solution, or become part of the
>problem Mankind has always followed the path of "least resistance". Not
>convenience, but freedom; the basic need and desire of all men.
>
>There are those who will say that we cannot occupy much of the unused land
>because much as been taken over by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). I
>say, for over two centuries we called the previous owners of those lands
>"savages". What do we call the current "owners" today?
>
>Today's Constitutional Leadership may not be "outdoorsmen". But it is the
>leadership's responsibility to call on such experts in this and other fields
>to provide workable solutions, not problems. A Plan of Action. Can it be
>done? Only if we truly desire it. Only if we demand it from our leaders or
>become leaders ourselves. Our history has shown us that America could never
>do the impossible, but Americans can.
>
>If it is agreed that this Constitutional Exodus is the only chance for our
>survival, then we must now challenge ourselves and others to produce ideas
>of how to locate, build, maintain, transport safely to, and to survive
>within our own societies. Covenant Communities? Call them what you want. But
>what ever they will be, I expect to see many more of them in the future. We
>will need experts in the following fields: Agriculture, Medicine,
>Sanitation, Education, Finance, Energy, Communications(including
>cryptography), Suverying, Construction, Record keeping, and Security, too
>name a few.
>
>Unlike our ancestors, the entire country has been surveyed. That information
>will be needed. Many of our industries and small towns that have long since
>died are now collecting rust and dust across America. Can we put them to
>some use? What useful ideas are out there that are prevented from being
>produced in society today? Can they be put to use in our society? How much
>fertile land remains unsettled?
>
>If Harriet Tubman could use her limited education and resources to create an
>"Underground Railroad" for Negro slaves who wanted to be free in hostile
>territory, then certainly we can create the same for the "slaves" of all
>colors today. We have better tools than our ancestors. We have a
>communications and transportation network that they did not have. We have
>information about the land and ourselves that they did not have. We
>centainly have more captial resources. Those slaves (my ancestors) merely
>had the desire to be free. Sure, they talked about it (and talked themselves
>out of it) for a long time. But they did it - against all odds. Any of us
>"slaves" want to help build a new railroad?
>
>We have our work cut out for us. Let's use the Information Highway as our
>educational and transitional information network. Perhaps a mail list or
>newsgroup can be created for this purpose. Yes, we must use the internet
>until we develop a network of communication that does not chain us to our
>desktop computers, telephone lines, communication towers, and local internet
>providers. We can also use Shorwave radio, and even word of mouth. It took
>guts to build the ship that took the first pilgrims across the Atlantic. It
>took even more guts to lift the anchor before launch. That is what's needed
>to ensure the Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness for ourselves and our
>Posterity. That's right: Our grandchildren and great-grandchildren are
>depending on us.
>
>We have the tools. We have the talents. We have the reason. We have the
>need. Do we have the resolve?
>
>Yes, it is a bold, risky idea. Yes, it will cost many of us our Lives, our
>fortunes and our scared honor. Many of us will not or cannot do it. May of
>us would die trying. But at least we'll die free. No one has all the
>answers. But among the Constitutionalists I've met across America, I know
>that My God has planted the seeds of wisdom and knowledge in each of them to
>survive the coming storm...together. We are all here for a reason. No brain
>is useless. None of us are expendable. No, not one of us.
>
>Those of us who have not started already should begin to prepare to live
>outside of the control of the Authority, rather than die within it. Those
>who are already doing so can teach the rest of us. Let us walked through the
>open door *before* it closes. No longer should we wait for the enemy to take
>away our weapons. We can win this battle by taking away the most dangerous
>weapons our enemy has poised against us...
>
>...Ourselves.
>
>Perhaps we can call it "Operation Mayflower".
>
>
>J.J. Johnson
>500 N. Rainbow Blvd.
>Suite 300
>Las Vegas, Nevada 89107
>fedbuster@mindspring.com
>
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************
>To subscribe or unsubscribe, email:
> majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com
>with the message:
> subscribe ignition-point email@address
>or
> unsubscribe ignition-point email@address
>**********************************************
>http://www.telepath.com/believer
>**********************************************
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail