Time: Wed Nov 12 23:50:30 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA23843
for [address in tool bar]; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 18:55:49 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 18:54:29 -0700
To: puma@caverns.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: Wednesday: VICTORY!!!
Cc: pmitch@primenet.com, supremelaw@ibm.net
References: <3.0.3.32.19971111173638.006c0b38@pop5.ibm.net>
<3.0.1.32.19971111173040.00975b10@caverns.com>
Hi Bud,
That's great news. You'll love these new
EIDE drives from Western Digital. Mine
are completely flawless, as I think you
already know.
The 6GB supports the Ultra-DMA high-speed
transfer rate of 33MB/sec. Are you going
to toggle it for this higher speed? Your
motherboard needs to support this speed,
however, and I believe it is a very recent
option. For example, my older motherboard,
an ASUS w/ 100MHz CPU, does NOT support it,
but the new Super Micro w/ 200MHz does, and
what a world of difference there is!
The difference is truly phenomenal.
More good news is that I won my jury trial today:
unanimous verdict for $3,113.42. The defense
attorney was hopping mad at the verdict, and
demanded that I come over to his office to pick
up the check; and this, after all the testimony
about HOW I am boycotting the banks, and WHY I
am boycotting the banks.
The judge also retaliated, again, by disallowing
my claim for ~$1,000 in legal services for the
defendants, so the jury could not issue a verdict
on that point. He ruled that the services were
unauthorized practice of law. I am going to
appeal that portion of the judgment. I objected
on the basis of the Original 13th Amendment (1819),
and the Impairment of Contracts Clause in the
U.S. Constitution. It turns out, the organic
Constitution mentions these two matters in the
very same provision, so that will simplify the
legal arguments I must make.
So, it looks like I will be appealing a "win"
in a civil case. How about them apples? :)
That should make the defense attorney even
more angry than he already is, and he is
hotter than a hornet right now.
The very same issue will arise again, when we
come around to deciding what my real expenses
I have had. I just can't wait for this same
judge to rule that my time is worth zero, because
I declined to hire a licensed attorney. What do
you want to bet that he does this to me, or
something comparable, like "paralegal" rates
at only $25/hour, when I have major appeals
before the United States Courts of Appeal?
In an expression of my gratitude to the Presiding
Judge for hearing my Motion for Change of Judge
so promptly, I sent him a complimentary copy of
Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF. Did I share that
with SLS, or not? I can't remember. I asked
Judge Gibson, Presiding, to forward it to the
official court librarian, so the entire city of
Tucson could have access to it (i.e. for those
who don't have Internet-capable computers).
I hope he takes this gift in the right spirit.
I think he will; he addressed the defense
attorney at "Sir Condit"; I almost winked at
Judge Gibson when he did that! That was a huge
gift in and of itself. WOW! Title of Nobility,
now ON THE RECORD!!!
The defense attorney was also very nervous,
because I alleged that the defendants embezzled
my money by paying it to the attorney, as
part of his retainer. In open court, I accused
the attorney of being in possession and control
of stolen property, in response to which he
went to great pains to explain to the jury that
the money was still in the defendants' checking
accounts. Sure!! I basically told the jury that
I did not keep track of serial numbers on Federal
Reserve Notes (and neither did he keep track of
them, either!) That point, evidently, was not
lost on the jury.
I broke the main culprit when he fell into a habit
of resorting to the answer: "I can't remember."
"I can't remember." Over and over! It sounded
terrible, even to me, and I have come to know
how much this guy lies.
Last but not least, the defense attorney had the
gall to accuse me of failing to attend every single
pre-trial hearing. In fact, at the very first
pre-trial hearing that was scheduled in the case,
the defense attorney double-booked, and went way
overtime in the Superior Court case he had to
attend, at our expense. We all waited for an
hour for him to show up, and he never did. But then,
to make it much worse, the judge never did hold that
hearing, thus showing deference to a man who had just
demonstrated attorney malpractice, right before the
judge's very eyes. It was very sad. So then, the
attorney ended up accusing me of never attending a
single pre-trial hearing.
I am telling you, Bud, this racket is giving themselves
away -- by accusing us of the very same crimes which
they themselves are committing. I think this is a very
pivotal observation, which can be applied across the
board.
I applied to the Appeals Court for leave to proceed
In Forma Pauperis ("IFP"), with a promise to pay the
docket fees as soon as possible, over 90 days, beginning
at any time they want. I don't know how they can
refuse such an offer. I will follow soon with a
supplement to that motion, to explain how I have
witnessed the Ninth Circuit demonstrate clear and
undeniable bias against litigants proceeding IFP.
Dixianne Hawks' case goes into that bias in very
great depth, thanks to John Wolfgram's brilliant
constitutional analysis, which I have published
in his honor, and to his great credit.
If the defense attorney insists on sending me a
check, can I forward it to you, endorsed by me,
without any problems? It will be for $3,113.42,
exactly.
I'll look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sleep well, and please celebrate a little, on me,
okay?
Good night. I'm exhausted, heading straight
for the shower, and a good night's sleep,
for a change.
Bye! :)
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 07:31 AM 11/12/97 -0700, you wrote:
>At 05:36 PM 11/11/97 -0700, you wrote:
>>Thanks, Bud. What new hard drive did you get?
>>
>6 Gb Western Digital EIDE. I will retain my 4 Gb SCSI at least until I'm
>sure all my data has survived the transition. Not sure yet, but this drive
>and SCSI card may become available for donation.
>
>I'm also doing a flash BIOS upgrade to support a single 6 Gb partition.
>That, along with the use of Double Space & no compression, will give me the
>maximum space and tiny cluster size. I forget just now what cluster size it
>gives, but it's the smallest available.
>
>>Until further notice, KJ would like all mail
>>to come in #10 envelopes via Priority U.S. Mail.
>>
>
>Ok.
>
>>Then they are waiting for him in his private mail
>>box, when he comes home from work.
>>
>>9x12 envelopes, and the Priority U.S. Mail flat
>>rate envelopes, are both too large.
>>
>>Thanks, Bud. Good luck with the upgrade. I do
>>hope it goes as smoothly as mine have gone.
>>
>>Later!
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>http://supremelaw.com
>>
>>
>>
>>At 05:30 PM 11/11/97 -0700, you wrote:
>>>Paul,
>>>
>>>I'll be offline most of tomorrow for a hard drive upgrade and
>>>reinstallation of piles of software.
>>>
>>>I will get to the bank and post office for KJ as soon as they open.
>>>
>>>
>>>*****************
>>>puma@caverns.com
>>>*****************
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================================
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
>>B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
>>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
>>email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
>>website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
>>_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
>>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
>>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
>>======================================================================== 12
>>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
>>
>>
>*****************
>puma@caverns.com
>*****************
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail