Time: Sun Feb 16 19:22:20 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA08370; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 13:26:36 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 19:18:12 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Murder By Committee - AIDS >The Intelligence Journal TIJAUG / spec. (edited) > >AIDS - MURDER BY COMMITTEE > >THERE HAS BEEN MUCH TALK in recent times on population control. >Conferences are held, such as the World Population Conference, sponsored by >the UN, which occurred recently in Cairo. Most folks are aware of the >Ethiopia problem, Somalia, Rwanda, stringent birth control measures >currently in force in China, where babies born over and above the stated >quota are denied citizen's rights and are in certain cases, especially with >females, routinely murdered. But for us to contemplate the notion that >there could conceivably be in force an orchestrated, world-wide population >program, even within countries of the First World, is to raise up a spectre >reminiscent of the atrocities committed by the Soviet leader, Joseph >Stalin, the Cambodian butcher, Pol Pot, or by Hitler's National Socialists >during World War 2. This notion is naturally a spectre too ghastly for the >average citizen to contemplate and so most do not. >Yet whether we like it or not, the evidence, in its abundance, is so very >before us and dictates that this is precisely what is currently being >carried out on a global scale, coordinated by a small group of master >manipulators behind the scenes. The reduction of the world's population >from 5.75 billion to a little under 2 billion by the year 2000 is the aim >of the New World Order's Global 2000 plan and it is going to affect you. >Global 2000 was initiated under the Carter presidency and was agreed to >without the knowledge of the world citizenry by a few unelected and >powerful groups who usurped control and elected themselves the right, as >the enlightened few, to govern, rule and regulate the many. And, as we >will learn, all this has been done behind our backs for the simple reason >that we would never have agreed to the measures had we been included in the >planning process. >Over the course of the next few issues, TIJ will examine the whole >Population Control question from a number of different viewpoints: from >the victims who have been targeted for 'elimination', from the various >authorities and agents who have been charged with the ominous task of >carrying out their masters' wishes and from the point of view of those in >the general population who would rather ignore the present, as well as the >lessons of history, and will consequently do nothing to protect themselves >physically or spiritually from what is coming down. > >BACKGROUND >At the end of World War 2, a phenomenon occurs that is to change forever >the perceptions of our world and the future of humanity. Millions of >soldiers coming home to lonely females fuel a population explosion so vast >that a billion souls are added to the planet's population in a little over >one generation. This 'baby boom' generation raises the concerns of the >governing elite (Illuminati) and a report is commissioned in 1957 by >President Dwight D. Eisenhower for scientists at Huntsville, Alabama, to >project the estimated impact of a continued population explosion occurring >right up to the Millennial Transfer, the year 2000. >The resulting report concludes that if nothing is done to curb the >population explosion, by whatever means deemed necessary, a fracturing of >the social and economic infrastructures will result as food and natural >resources are depleted and fresh drinking water becomes impossible to >obtain in sufficient quantity. The growing effects of pollution, >desertification, environmental catastrophes, changing weather patterns, the >conquering of traditional 'killer' diseases, better understanding of human >and animal nutrition, and the ability of medical technology to prolong life >are all included in the reckoning. >Eisenhower had this to say in 1957: >"As a result of lowered infant mortality, longer lives, and the >accelerating conquest of famine, there is underway a population explosion >so incredibly great that in little more than another generation, the >population of the world is expected to double." >A further study is later made by the Club of Rome (Illuminati) to determine >the limits of growth. The result is the same. This report concludes with >two basic options for the future control of the world's human herd: >Option One: Decrease the birth rate. >Option Two is only to be considered in the event that Option One is >ineffective. >Option Two: Increase the death rate. >During the sixties, Option One is implemented with the advent of the Pill, >abortion and hysterectomy procedures, fluoridation of the water supply, the >encouragement and promotion of the gay and lesbian lifestyle as a means of >zero population growth along with a handful of other measures. The US >State Department's new Office of Population Affairs (OPA) pioneers several >unsavoury political and military methods of stringent population control >for application in countries deemed most 'at risk' (Nicaragua, El Salvador, >Cambodia, Laos, etc). Thomas Ferguson, Latin American case officer for the >OPA, gives us a valuable insight into his, and his department's, >'humanity', by remarking: "There is a single theme behind all our work; we >must reduce population levels. Either they do it our way, through nice >clean methods or they will get the kind of mess we have in El Salvador, or >in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population >is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to >reduce it..." > >TARGETING THE MINNOWS >By 1969 it becomes obvious to the Power Elite that Option One is falling >sadly short of projected reduction targets chiefly because the population >explosions are occurring in the Third World. Option Two is thus brought >out of the closet, dusted off and laid on the drawing board. Several >operatives have remarked that the Illuminati really did not rule out the >possibility of a limited theater nuclear conflict in order to achieve the >goals required to meet the OPA's Global 2000 targets and, as we shall >discover, this thermonuclear option may yet become a reality in the Middle >Eastern scenario we have been discussing elsewhere in this Journal. But >for now, the cryptocracy addresses the alternative of increasing the death >rate by using methods that will largely go undetected within the broader >population spectrum. >One can only imagine the genuine heart-rending that must have occurred when >certain citizen group demographics were discussed and short-listed for >elimination. It seems all too easy to paint ALL the players with black >hats without realising that working along with the inner core of wickedness >is a softer middle 'gopher' core who really have a heart but believe that >harsh measures have to be adopted for the greater good of humanity. This >particular viewpoint is hard to gainsay for the non-believer in Jesus >Christ. After all, when faced with such an apocalyptic population problem >that has grown out of all proportion and control, what would you do if you >were the man (or woman) in the hot seat and you thought it was all up to >you? >Happily for the greater good of humanity, there is a God on the throne of >heaven who is discharging His Will and, for the moment, allowing Satan's >One Worlders to have their way and their wickedness - and believe me, they >are making the most of it. Most of the 15 strategic planners who comprised >the infamous Iron Mountain Study Group have input into solving the OPA's >Global 2000 population problem and it is finally agreed that the target >groups will be the 'undesirable' elements of humanity - the black and >Hispanic races along with the Useless Eaters: the crippled, homosexuals and >drug addicts. The Planners decree that homosexuality and 'alternative >lifestyles' will be enthusiastically encouraged, not only to broaden the >selection of risk groups, but also to meet the 'Silent Weapons For Quiet >Wars' goals for the disintegration of the family unit in order that the >socialist hold over the individual could be strengthened. Thus, drug >mystics and swinging gurus such as John Lennon, Timothy Leary and Andy >Warhol begin their sordid influence on the LSD-bombed patsies of the >Herman's Hermit sixties generation. > >THE MEDIA CIRCUS >On July 1st 1969, House Bill 15090 comes into existence. Funding is >obtained from the US Congress where $10 million is given to the Department >of Defense's (DOD) 1970 budget. The sub-committee on Department of Defense >is chaired by George H Mahon (Texas) This committee hosts an application >to fund a project concerned with producing 'a synthetic biological agent, >an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity >could have been acquired. Within the next 5 to 10 years it would probably >be possible to make a new infective micro-organism which could differ in >certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most >important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and >therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom >from infectious disease....' >Sir Julian Huxley said, "Overpopulation is, in my opinion, the most serious >threat to the future of our species." According to ONI agent, M. William >Cooper, the project, designated MK-NAOMI, is carried out at the United >States Army Medical Research Institute For Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) >at Fort Detrick, Maryland and appears to take between 5 to 10 years to >complete. In 1978, the first cases of AIDS hit the headlines of the >western world and the awful realisation sets in that a new pandemic and >indestructible virus is loose in the world - and apparently a virus that >isn't particular. Anyone can become a target. >But not all are convinced by the 'party line' on AIDS and believe the >scientists. Several establishment experts 'shoot themselves in the foot' >with bizarre contradictions in information that get the less spooked among >us thinking furiously. Firstly we are told AIDS is caused by HIV. Then we >are told HIV can be spread by saliva, dentists and mosquitoes... and then >it can't. Condoms are supposed to prevent HIV infection, then we are told, >'not in every case'. >Meanwhile the tabloids feast on the HIV fear-entrails of all and sundry >with every organ stop yanked out. The Press scare about AIDS becomes so >virulent that virtual panic breaks out in the homosexual communities of >Haight Ashbury, San Francisco and West Hollywood, Los Angeles. Papers feed >the horrified, heterosexual Joe-In-The-Street stories about poor souls, >upon receiving HIV-positive results, climbing the stairs to the hospital >roof and launching themselves into eternity; documentaries are >apologetically aired about killer, HIV-infected prostitutes with a grudge >against males or sex-crazed, rape villains blackmailing defenceless >housewives with HIV infection. >Then there are the TV 'specials' where we see, feel and live the last, >ghastly moments of a few of our favourite stars: Rock Hudson, Liberace, >Freddie Mercury, Arthur Ashe... their final days, the last anguish of an >eleventh-hour, cripplingly expensive cure that doesn't quite make it, >broadcast around the world with their sallow, lonely and broken faces >begging us to save them. The collective conscience of a world people >shivers involuntarily with the titillation and the terror of it all, as >fallen humanity realizes that all the money, super-technology, doe-eyed >politicians and last minute AIDS rallies in the world are useless in the >face of such a determined and implacable micro-enemy. >The net effect? Population control. Not only Option Two... but also >Option One. > Mr and Mrs Smith begin looking at each other like they are some kind of >biological warfare agent bent on world destruction and the usual marital >cry for physical fulfilment across the globe begins to be shyly answered >with the whisper: "Not tonight, Joseph/Josephine." Fear is the key. On TV >and movie screens, the AIDS Monster is loosed upon the masses through >fictional portrayals. From Philadelphia (Tom Hanks) to the British sitcom, >Eastenders, the 'facts' about AIDS are dramatised and slammed home into the >traumatised, collective, public psyche so all may get the message. >The declared pathological make-up of AIDS is also a mystery. Here is a >virus (allegedly HIV) which can creep into your system and remain dormant >for up to 10 years and then wham! bang! you're toast. Lesions all over >your face and body, barrier nurses face-masking around you, friends and >relatives making excuses and disappearing... and then there's the horrible >and pitiful death, spasming, haemorrhaging and croaking a last breath at >your wincing attorney before becoming another one of the horrifying and >climbing statistics. All over the world, doctors begin announcing the new, >shocking diagnosis: "You have HIV/AIDS. There is no cure", and the poor >wretch shambles away, pathetically attempting to hide his shame and fear >from his family and friends until the pressure can no longer be borne. >Hmmmmm. >Folks, we have been put together better than an Airfix model. As usual, we >have been conned and stitched tighter than a Thanksgiving turkey. What >follows is a press release report by Jeremy Selvey of Project AIDS Int'l >which was submitted to the United Nations on May 23rd 1993 and which, >naturally, has never made it into general media circulation because of its >explosive nature. > > > > >SINCE 1984, IT HAS BEEN assumed that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) >is the sole and direct cause of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome >(AIDS). This assumption is based on the postulation of Dr Robert C. Gallo >(formally a cancer researcher from the US National Cancer Institute, NCI) >the alleged discoverer of HIV who is currently working for the US National >Institutes for Health (NIH) as their leading AIDS researcher. >In December, 1992, Dr Gallo was convicted of science fraud by the Office of >Research Integrity - an oversight department of the NIH - based on his >declaration that he had discovered HIV. In fact the discovery of HIV had >been accredited to Dr Luc Montagnier of the Institutes de Pasteur in >France. Dr Montagnier has stated on numerous occasions, "I do not believe >that HIV is, in and of itself, the cause of AIDS. I believe we should >place as much emphasis on potential co-factors as we have on HIV." >Dr Gallo is currently under investigation by the US Congress on various >other charges of scientific fraud, which by their very accusation, cast >doubts upon the validity of any of Dr Gallo's work pertaining to AIDS. In >addition, Dr Gallo has received, and continues to receive, millions of >dollars in royalties based on the test he created for HIV. >Based on Dr Gallo's unproven hypothesis that HIV is the sole and direct >cause of AIDS, the US Public Health Service1 has embarked on a campaign of >implied terror and misinformation that has continued to state that "HIV, >the virus that causes AIDS" can be controlled by getting tested for the >'AIDS virus' and starting 'early intervention' in the event of a 'positive >test result'. Early intervention is defined as starting 'treatment' with >the drug, zidovudine, also known as AZT - a nonselective nucleoside >analogue, DNA chain-terminating chemotherapy manufactured by Glaxo Wellcome >PLC of Dartford, Kent, England. AZT is cytotoxic, in that it kills all >cells indiscriminately, not just those cells infected by HIV. >In addition, promoters of this false hypothesis state that the "proper >monitoring of your T Cells" will assure that you will know at what stage to >begin AZT treatment. The current primary measure for early intervention >with AZT is when your T cells (specifically CD4+ helper cells) "fall to >500 or below on two consecutive blood tests." The CDC (Centers For Disease >Control) states (without benefit of scientific reference) that the "normal" >range for CD4+ helper cells in HIV-negative "healthy" persons is 600 to >1200. However, based on PAI's research, given the published information in >accredited medical journals2 the normal range for CD4+ helper cells for >healthy HIV-negative adults is 237-1,817. >Further, in tests completed on US Olympic athletes in 1984, the average >range for CD4+ helper cells was between 400 and 600. Certainly, the US >athletes were not considered to be unhealthy; yet these are the markers >used to instill fear and manipulate HIV-positive persons into taking a >toxic chemotherapy when they are otherwise completely healthy. >Project AIDS International (PAI) charges that this dogmatic hypothesis >based on the findings of a person convicted of science fraud, and >perpetration of this information by the United States government who >continues employing Dr Gallo, is either directly or indirectly responsible >for the premature deaths of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. >Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is said to be the virus that causes >AIDS. This virus has been inappropriately named as it has never been >proven to cause immunodeficiency in either animals or humans. Further, HIV >is not even found in all cases of AIDS3. Koch's Postulates, which are the >most widely accepted criteria for the definition of a disease, state three >factors must exist in order "to prove that the micro-organism is the cause >of a disease." >1) "...it must be present in all cases of a specific disease..." > Note: HIV is not present in all cases of AIDS. >2) "...inoculations of its pure culture must produce the same disease in >animals..." > Note: Efforts to produce AIDS by inoculation in animals have been >unsuccessful. >3) "...and from these it must be obtained in pure cultures and propagated." > Note: This has yet to be accomplished. >Therefore HIV cannot be the direct cause of AIDS. This may also explain >why we have "long term survivors" who are HIV-positive and without symptoms >in excess of 14 years4. >A paper published in 1990 by Beverly E. Griffin5 quotes two London >microbiologists who say, "It would be irresponsible to produce guidelines >on AIDS until an infectious micro-organism is identified and the means by >which it causes disease are understood. It is only now becoming obvious >that infection with HIV does not usually give rise to AIDS." >PAI contacted the CDC several times and found that they disavowed any >knowledge of cases where HIV was absent from AIDS related symptoms. After >speaking with several physicians and scientists working in conjunction with >various government offices, it was reported6 there exist over two thousand >cases of HIV-free AIDS! However we were cautioned that, even though this >is a public health issue, this information was (and is) embargoed. >After much pressure from PAI, CDC sent documentation of at least 30 cases >of HIV-free AIDS. Subsequently, as of December 1992, CDC reported 97 such >cases. Since 1985 there have been cases of HIV-free AIDS reported and >confirmed by serology of p24 antigen expression, polymearse chain reaction >(PCR) and viral culture tests. In the light of the incidence of HIV-free >AIDS and HIV-positive long-term survivors without progression to AIDS, how >can we permit the dominant notion that HIV is "the virus that causes AIDS" >to be perpetuated? >This single-minded approach to AIDS research has not saved one life, and >precludes any other form of potentially viable research into the actual >causes, or treatment options of the condition termed AIDS. >In pursuit of answers, PAI contacted the CDC in January 1993 for scientific >citation as to their claim that HIV was, in fact, the cause of AIDS. An >unidentified person at CDC stated that "it was just known" that HIV causes >AIDS, but was unable to cite any scientific reference. In response to PAI's >demand for documentation, three weeks later they received a packet citing >Dr Gallo's published paper7 on the cause of AIDS that stated, >unequivocally, HIV was the sole and direct cause of AIDS. Since PAI has >received this document it has been reported that Dr Gallo was convicted of >one count of science fraud for falsifying official scientific documentation >with other charges pending. >We would firstly question why the CDC spends so much time, effort and money >in marketing a false hypothesis via the media and in print. By >misinforming the medical profession and the general public and creating a >climate of fear and despair, CDC at best is acting irresponsibly, but also >is intentionally inflicting undue mental duress on its citizens, and at >worst, their deception has cost the lives of hundreds of thousands and will >ultimately result in the needless loss of millions more worldwide. >Another nepotistic fact that has become increasing blatant is the >propensity for the Centers For Disease Control to share letterhead with the >Pharmaceutical Advertising Counsel9 for various AIDS educational >publications, especially those put out by the CDC in conjunction with the >Pharmaceutical Manufacturer's Association8 (which is also endorsed by the >US FDA (Food and Drug Administration)). This appears to indicate an >implication of impropriety based on the fact that the US FDA is an >enforcement agency charged with the regulation of all legal drugs and >therefore should maintain a professional distance from private >pharmaceutical interests so as to remain an impartial, unbiased oversight >agency. This has resulted in a monopoly of manipulation based on an >unproven HIV hypothesis which is being actively marketed to the people by >both private and government sectors for the sake of financial gain at the >expense of human life. > >AZT: AIDS BY PRESCRIPTION >The drug, zidovudine, known as AZT under the brand name Retrovir, is a >nucleoside analogue DNA chain terminator; it kills human cells >indiscriminately by terminating DNA chain synthesis, which is the central >molecule of life. AZT was claimed by the manufacturer, Glaxo Wellcome (UK >) PLC, to be the only drug of the AIDS crisis, at a time when desperate >AIDS patients had lost all hope. Burroughs-Wellcome Company10, a US >subsidiary of Glaxo-Wellcome (UK) PLC, alleged they were the creators of >AZT - only after realizing that a very profitable market existed for "long >term" treatment of "terminally ill" patients with the drug. >Burroughs-Wellcome's statement contradicts the assertion of Dr Jerome >Horowitz11 who claims he created AZT in 1964. This was followed by an >onslaught of scandals alleging bribes, payoffs and cover-ups regarding the >initial clinical trials of the toxicity and effectiveness of AZT. Despite >the previous claims of discovery, it was uncovered by PAI that AZT was >originally created by Dr Richard Beltz in 1961 during his research on >nucleoside analogues dating back to 195112. >According to Dr Beltz the reasons that AZT was abandoned were firstly that >its extreme toxicity made it unsuitable for any chemotherapy - even short >term, and secondly it was carcinogenic (cancer causing) at any dose. In a >quote by Dr Peter H. Duesberg13, "Since AZT cannot distinguish HIV infected >cells from uninfected cells, and only one in one thousand CD4 cells is ever >infected, AZT must kill 999 healthy cells for every one cell "infected". >AZT suppresses HIV by suppressing the manufacturing of CD4 cells, >predictably causing anaemia, immunodeficiency and other degenerative >diseases; thus AZT is AIDS by prescription." > >BABIES ARE DYING >AND THEY'RE NOT EVEN SICK! >An eighteen month study consisting of three dozen pediatric physicians in >ten European cities14 states that of 372 infants born to HIV-positive >mothers, only 13% of the infants ever acquired the HIV virus. Thus 87% of >the infants who showed to be HIV-positive, either by presumption or >serology, seroconverted to HIV-negative within eighteen months without >therapeutic intervention. In the United States this has been further >documented15 in a study demonstrating that approximately two thirds of >infants born to HIV-positive mothers also seroconverted to HIV-negative >within eighteen months, again without therapeutic intervention. >>From this, one could conclude that the practice of treating HIV-positive >infants with AZT - 1) based on tests with questionable accuracy such as the >ELISA and Western Blot and 2) presumptive diagnosis when no clinical >illness is present - is murder. Murder as used here means "the >introduction of a known toxic substance that ultimately results in the >infant's premature death." The fact that prescribing AZT is considered a >"majority practice" is no defence for the violation of the basic human >right to life. >Glaxo-Wellcome PLC cites numerous studies to substantiate their claims that >AZT both "prolongs life" and "enhances its quality". An analysis shows an >overwhelming concern of impropriety of data based on one simple fact: all >studies that tout AZT's benefits are made possible, either directly or >indirectly, by grant money from Burroughs-Wellcome Foundation. Studies >that show impartial data are done so without the influence of >Burroughs-Wellcome and indicate that AZT neither prolongs life nor enhances >its quality16 17. The US original Phase 1 and II clinical trials of the >safety and efficacy of AZT were patently fraudulent and criminal in their >application18. This information clearly demonstrates that the US FDA is >criminally liable for violating the very laws that they are entrusted to >enforce. >The failure of Burroughs-Wellcome and the US FDA to disclose the facts that >the use of AZT will result in the patient's premature death is not just >restricted to the US. Throughout the United Kingdom, Wellcome's propaganda >continues to cite unfounded promises of hope in an outlandish breach of >truth in advertising. According to Wellcome's information pamphlet, >"Positive Benefits", there are "no life-threatening side-effects associated >with zidovudine". >Meditel, a London-based medical television production company, filed >criminal complaints against Wellcome with the Medicines Control Agency >(MCA) in England. This action was based on the breach of Section 93 of the >Medicines Control Act by misleading claims of the benefits of AZT in >Wellcome's advertising in the UK19. As a result, Wellcome filed a >complaint against Meditel for libel with the Broadcasting Complaints >Commission. However, they ceased their action when Meditel demanded >clinical registry information on persons who have lived longer than three >years on AZT. Since Wellcome was unable to provide the required data, they >retracted their complaint against Meditel. Still the MCA has taken no >satisfactory actions against Wellcome for reasons as yet not made clear. >Meditel's complaint addressed to Professor William Asscher20 states: "We >are particularly concerned about four claims and one omission in Wellcome's >literature about AZT. These matters are very serious as we believe that >Wellcome's 'Positive Benefits' brochure and leaflet on AZT produced >together with the Terrence Higgins Trust should be withdrawn immediately >whilst these matters are being investigated." >In a quote from Joseph Sonnabend, a renowned AIDS researcher in the US, >regarding AZT: "It is beyond belief. I don't know what to do. I'm ashamed >of my colleagues. I'm embarrassed. This is such shoddy science. It's >hard to believe nobody's protesting. Damned cowards! The name of the game >is to protect your grants. Don't open your mouth. It's all about money. >It's grounds for just following the party line and not being critical when >there are obvious financial and political forces driving this." [TIJ >emphasis] >Dr Sonnabend filed a report21 questioning the basis for the licensing of >AZT. He was never even been given a reply from either the US FDA or >Burroughs-Wellcome. >Dr Harvey Bialy, a molecular biologist and science editor of >BIO/TECHNOLOGY, states: "I'm stunned by the low quality of science >surrounding AIDS research. I'm horrified by the widespread use of AZT. >Not just because it is toxic, but because the claims of efficacy are false. > I can't see how this drug can be doing anything other than making people >very sick." [TIJ emphasis] >In addition to the above, studies indicate that the original toxicity >profile of AZT was fraudulently reported and is actually 1000 times more >toxic to human cells than was originally claimed. There is in fact one >more side-effect about which Wellcome have neglected to forewarn the >public, as the mounting worldwide statistics will indisputably bear out - >death. >There is another damning piece of evidence which links Wellcome, the US FDA >and thus the British and American governments to what can, at best, be >described as criminal negligent homicide and at worst, genocide. Karposi's >Sarcoma, the skin disfiguring lesions afflicting a proportion of AIDS >sufferers, is known to be caused by excessive use of the recreational >compound, amyl nitrite or 'poppers', which is used by homosexuals to >heighten climax during intercourse. The world patent on 'poppers' is held >by Burroughs-Wellcome. n > >1 Consisting of the Center For Disease Control (CDC), National Institutes >of Health (NIH), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other governmental >health care agencies >2 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Denny, et al, vol, >267; 1484-1488 >3 US CDC report of AIDS cases without the presence of HIV - December 1992 >4 UCSF - Buchbinder, et al. "HIV+ Long Term Survivor Study" October 1992 >5 Director and Professor of Virology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, >London - Nature, May 1990 >6 P.H. Duesberg, Science, September 1992 >7 Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 1:521-535 / 1988 >8 A private sector trade union of which Wellcome is a member >9 Document Number A6 / PAI Archives 1992 >10 A US subsidiary of Wellcome, Ltd >11 A researcher for NIH >12 R. Waters Thesis, Loma Linda University - 1972 / PAI Archives >13 Professor of Molecular Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and a distinguished >member of the National Academy of Science >14 Peckham, et al. Infant Seroconversion Profile, London - 1990 >15 New York University Medical Center Pediatric Department - 1990 >16,17 Hamilton, et al. VA Study 1990 / CDC Unreleased Study 1990 >18 US Freedom of Information Act documents - 1986 >19 Wellcome, Ltd. Brochure - "Positive Benefits" >20 Committee on Safety of Medicines, St George’s Medical School, London >21 J.A. Sonnabend Report on MultiCenter Study of AZT to FDA - 1987 > >Further Documentation On AIDS >And Population Control > >Behold, A Pale Horse - William Cooper, Lite Technology Publishing. Murder >By Injection - Eustace Mullins, Deep River. Global Outlook 2000 - United >Nations Publications 1990. The Population Bomb - Dr Paul R Ehrlich, Club >Of Rome Publications. The Limits to Growth, A Report For the Club of >Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind - Dr Aurelio Peccei. Deadly >Deception - Dr Robert Willner, Deep River. The Strecker Memorandum - Dr >Robert Strecker. > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0 on Intel 80586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail