Time: Wed Apr 16 09:32:30 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA25889;
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:19:57 -0700 (MST)
by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA11808;
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:19:26 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:20:47 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Forwarded from Dave Rydel (3 of 3)
>Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 10:24:44 -0400
>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net>
>
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>>>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net>
>>>Subject: SLS: People v. United States et al. (update: 2 of 2)
>>>
>>>>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:07:30 -0700
>>>>To: (Recipient list suppressed)
>>>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>>>Subject: SLS: People v. United States et al. (update: 2 of 2)
>>>>
>>>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
>>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator
>>>>c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
>>>>Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>>>ARIZONA STATE
>>>>
>>>>Under Protest, Necessity, and
>>>>by Special Visitation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
>>>>
>>>> JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MONTANA
>>>>
>>>> BILLINGS DIVISION
>>>>
>>>>People of the United States ) Case No. CV-96-163-BLG
>>>>of America, ex relatione )
>>>>Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
>>>> ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF
>>>> Petitioners, ) CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY
>>>> ) OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE:
>>>> vs. )
>>>> ) 28 U.S.C. 1447(d)
>>>>United States et al., )
>>>> )
>>>> Respondent. )
>>>>____________________________)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>COME NOW the People of the United States of America (hereinafter
>>>>
>>>>"Petitioners"), ex relatione Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,
>>>>
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state, expressly not a citizen of the United
>>>>
>>>>States, federal witness, and Counselor at Law (hereinafter
>>>>
>>>>"Relator"), to present this, Their MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
>>>>
>>>>OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF CHALLENGE TO THE
>>>>
>>>>CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE filed concurrently
>>>>
>>>>with Their MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Plaintiffs hereby
>>>>
>>>>challenge the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. 1447(d).
>>>>
>>>> In the ORDER of Chief United States District Judge Jack D.
>>>>
>>>>Shanstrom, dated and filed in the instant case on April 8, 1997,
>>>>
>>>>the following plain error is manifest, to wit:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 1 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... [T]he removal statutes do not afford a
>>>> petitioner/plaintiff the power to remove a case to federal
>>>> court.
>>>>
>>>> Petitioners respectfully request this honorable District
>>>>
>>>>Court of the United States (hereinafter "DCUS") to compare two
>>>>
>>>>important removal statutes which are available to all civil
>>>>
>>>>litigants. Section 1441(b) of Title 28, United States Code,
>>>>
>>>>contains a general restatement of the original jurisdiction of
>>>>
>>>>the DCUS, without any requirement that the removing party(s) be
>>>>
>>>>defendant(s), to wit:
>>>>
>>>> (b) Any civil action of which the district courts have
>>>> original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising
>>>> under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United
>>>> States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship
>>>> or residence of the parties.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The above statute makes absolutely no mention whatsoever of a
>>>>
>>>>"defendant", or "defendants". In clear contrast to the above
>>>>
>>>>statute, the companion statute at section 1441(a) does explicitly
>>>>
>>>>restrict its availability to civil defendant(s) only, to wit:
>>>>
>>>> (a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of
>>>> Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which
>>>> the district courts of the United States have original
>>>> jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the
>>>> defendants, to the district court of the United States for
>>>> the district and division embracing the place where such
>>>> action is pending.
>>>> [emphasis added]
>>>>
>>>> Petitioners rely upon the maxim of construction: inclusio
>>>>
>>>>unius est exclusio alterius, in order to show that Congress
>>>>
>>>>omitted any references to the "defendant" or "defendants" in
>>>>
>>>>section 1441(b), because the omission was intentional;
>>>>
>>>>specifically, it is the intent of Congress to allow plaintiffs to
>>>>
>>>>remove civil action(s) from state courts into the DCUS,
>>>>
>>>>particularly when the DCUS has original jurisdiction that is
>>>>
>>>>founded on a claim or right arising under a law of the United
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 2 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>States. See Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). The FOIA is a
>>>>
>>>>law of the United States. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B) for the
>>>>
>>>>grant of original jurisdiction to the DCUS to enjoin the
>>>>
>>>>withholding of documents properly requested under FOIA, and to
>>>>
>>>>order the production of documents improperly withheld.
>>>>
>>>> Accordingly, the USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is in error
>>>>
>>>>for remanding the instant case back to the Montana Sixteenth
>>>>
>>>>Judicial District Court ("State Court"), because it is based on
>>>>
>>>>the false premise that a petitioner/plaintiff does not have the
>>>>
>>>>power to remove a case to federal court, under any removal
>>>>
>>>>statutes in Chapter 89 of Title 28, United States Code. In so
>>>>
>>>>doing, said ORDER would effectively deny a judicial remedy which
>>>>
>>>>is Petitioners' right in the instant case, because the FOIA
>>>>
>>>>creates a federal cause of action in the case of all FOIA
>>>>
>>>>requests properly submitted and improperly withheld by the
>>>>
>>>>agency(s) in question. Moreover, the State Court has no
>>>>
>>>>jurisdiction whatsoever, either original or appellate, to enjoin
>>>>
>>>>the withholding of documents properly requested under FOIA and/or
>>>>
>>>>to order the production of documents improperly withheld.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATUTE
>>>>
>>>> Petitioners hereby also challenge the constitutionality of
>>>>
>>>>28 U.S.C. 1447(d), to wit:
>>>>
>>>> (d) An order remanding a case to the State court from which
>>>> it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise,
>>>> except that an order remanding a case to the State court
>>>> from which it was removed pursuant to section 1443 of this
>>>> title shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Petitioners hereby deny any reliance whatsoever upon section
>>>>
>>>>1443, thus rendering moot the second half of section 1447(d).
>>>>
>>>>However, Petitioners argue that the first half of said section is
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 3 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>overly broad for permitting arbitrary, capricious, erroneous,
>>>>
>>>>and/or injurious orders to be sustained artificially, and for
>>>>
>>>>depriving litigants of remedies which are their fundamental
>>>>
>>>>Right, under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> The USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is a classic case in
>>>>
>>>>point. The instant case arose from Petitioners' desire to obtain
>>>>
>>>>a temporary restraining order ("TRO") preventing the use of
>>>>
>>>>lethal force against the Montana Freeman [sic], and also to
>>>>
>>>>obtain a permanent injunction preventing any deprivations, by
>>>>
>>>>Respondents, of the life, liberty, or property of Citizens of
>>>>
>>>>Montana state without due process of law. See Fifth Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> After the Montana Freemen surrendered peacefully, without
>>>>
>>>>any loss of life, the application for TRO was rendered moot.
>>>>
>>>>However, the permanent injunction against Respondents is still an
>>>>
>>>>open question, and it has yet to be decided finally by this
>>>>
>>>>honorable Court, or by the State Court from whence the instant
>>>>
>>>>case originated. Petitioners submit, therefore, that the
>>>>
>>>>application of due process of law is quite salient in the instant
>>>>
>>>>case, as a remedy still available not only to the Citizens of
>>>>
>>>>Montana state, but also to the respective litigants in the
>>>>
>>>>instant case, who are not necessarily Citizens of Montana state.
>>>>
>>>> It was only after the instant case was filed in State Court,
>>>>
>>>>that Petitioners then decided to submit a proper FOIA request to
>>>>
>>>>the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") for the
>>>>
>>>>credentials of all six hundred thirty-three (633) alleged federal
>>>>
>>>>agents who rotated in and out of the Freeman Standoff. When DOJ
>>>>
>>>>failed to produce the requested documents, after receipt of
>>>>
>>>>proper FOIA requests and appeals, and after expiration of the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 4 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>statutory deadlines for same, Petitioners had then exhausted all
>>>>
>>>>administrative remedies and were then faced with an immediate
>>>>
>>>>need to invoke the court of original jurisdiction over the FOIA;
>>>>
>>>>that court is the DCUS. No other court fits the bill.
>>>>
>>>> Accordingly, Petitioners are now faced with the very real
>>>>
>>>>prospect of being forever deprived of their procedural Right to
>>>>
>>>>enforce the FOIA upon DOJ. Should the USDC'S ORDER of April 8 be
>>>>
>>>>permitted to stand and thereby to remove the instant case back to
>>>>
>>>>the State Court, there will have been, in that event, no
>>>>
>>>>litigation whatsoever on the federal questions which arise from
>>>>
>>>>the original FOIA request and appeal. This result directly
>>>>
>>>>contravenes the explicit legislative intent of 28 U.S.C. 1441(e):
>>>>
>>>> (e) The court to which such civil action is removed is not
>>>> precluded from hearing and determining any claim in such
>>>> civil action because the State court from which such civil
>>>> action is removed did not have jurisdiction over that claim.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Petitioners submit, for the careful consideration of this
>>>>
>>>>honorable Court, that section 1441(e) applies directly, and
>>>>
>>>>unequivocally, to the instant case, particularly with respect to
>>>>
>>>>the judicial enforcement of the FOIA. This is so, precisely
>>>>
>>>>because the State Court from which the instant civil action was
>>>>
>>>>removed does not have any jurisdiction over FOIA enforcement.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, this honorable DCUS is not precluded from hearing
>>>>
>>>>and determining Petitioners' claim upon judicially compelled
>>>>
>>>>discovery of the documents requested in the original FOIA request
>>>>
>>>>and appeal, i.e. credentials, such as Appointment Affidavits
>>>>
>>>>and/or Oaths of Office. See, in particular, Article VI, Clause 3
>>>>
>>>>and 5 U.S.C. 3331.
>>>>
>>>> When examined against this clear and unequivocal right,
>>>>
>>>>which is enforceable by the FOIA, the restriction found at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 5 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>section 1447(d) cannot stand on its own, nor can it be applied in
>>>>
>>>>the instant case, because said section confounds, if it does not
>>>>
>>>>directly contradict, the procedural Right(s) which are recognized
>>>>
>>>>by section 1441(e).
>>>>
>>>> Section 1447(d) is particularly offensive in that it
>>>>
>>>>prohibits review on appeal or otherwise. Petitioners submit that
>>>>
>>>>this additional qualifier -- "or otherwise" -- would logically
>>>>
>>>>prohibit judicial review of Petitioners' MOTION FOR
>>>>
>>>>RECONSIDERATION, filed concurrently with this MEMORANDUM.
>>>>
>>>>Petitioners are now entirely confident that They, as Plaintiffs,
>>>>
>>>>have every Right under section 1441(b) to remove the State Case
>>>>
>>>>into this honorable DCUS, to enforce FOIA, if nothing else.
>>>>
>>>> The USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is based on the erroneous
>>>>
>>>>premise that a petitioner/plaintiff does not have the power to
>>>>
>>>>remove a case to federal court. If allowed to stand, upon
>>>>
>>>>authority of section 1447(d), said ORDER would work a grave
>>>>
>>>>injustice upon Petitioners and result in barratry upon their
>>>>
>>>>efforts to compel discovery of the requisite credentials of all
>>>>
>>>>633 federal agents who participated in the Freeman Standoff.
>>>>
>>>>This is not a small number. Without federal review by this
>>>>
>>>>honorable Court in the instant case, Petitioners would then be
>>>>
>>>>faced with exorbitant legal costs to mount still more law suits
>>>>
>>>>in State Court, under applicable state discovery laws.
>>>>
>>>> However, the separation of powers doctrine casts serious
>>>>
>>>>doubt on the ability of state courts to compel discovery of
>>>>
>>>>federal employees' credentials, via Mandamus or otherwise. See
>>>>
>>>>the plaintiffs' pleadings on that subject in People v. Boxer,
>>>>
>>>>California Supreme Court case number S-030016, December 1992.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 6 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is by no means settled that state courts can compel
>>>>
>>>>specific performance by federal employees. So, remanding the
>>>>
>>>>case back to State Court raises the very real prospect that
>>>>
>>>>Relator could not afford to prosecute the same subject matter all
>>>>
>>>>over again, a second time, due to additional legal costs which
>>>>
>>>>would otherwise be unnecessary. Lex non cogit impossibilia.
>>>>
>>>> It is also clear that section 1441(e) contemplates cases in
>>>>
>>>>which the DCUS is empowered to remove and hear state cases in
>>>>
>>>>which there is a federal cause of action, and to remand all other
>>>>
>>>>causes of action which properly belong back in state court.
>>>>
>>>> As applied to the instant case, it would be proper, for
>>>>
>>>>example, for this honorable DCUS to remand certain injunctive
>>>>
>>>>remedies back to the State Court, with a recommendation to stay
>>>>
>>>>that proceeding, pending final judgment in the matter of
>>>>
>>>>compelling discovery of the credentials which have been
>>>>
>>>>requested. In that way, the outcome of the state case could then
>>>>
>>>>pivot on whether, or not, the credentials existed in the first
>>>>
>>>>instance and, if they did, whether or not said credentials should
>>>>
>>>>be enforced in equity; if they did not exist, then the State
>>>>
>>>>Court would then be the proper forum to adjudicate probable
>>>>
>>>>violations of applicable state laws, e.g. trespass, extortion,
>>>>
>>>>kidnap, perjury, and impersonating an officer.
>>>>
>>>> But, such a pivotal determination would necessarily be
>>>>
>>>>required to await FOIA enforcement in the DCUS, because that is
>>>>
>>>>the court of original jurisdiction, and it would possibly also be
>>>>
>>>>required to await appellate review, by the federal appeals court
>>>>
>>>>(Ninth Circuit) and possibly also the Supreme Court of the United
>>>>
>>>>States, of all relief granted by the DCUS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 7 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SUMMARY
>>>>
>>>> Petitioners hereby challenge 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) for being
>>>>
>>>>overly broad, for conflicting with 28 U.S.C. 1441(e), and for
>>>>
>>>>depriving Petitioners of an essential remedy when a federal cause
>>>>
>>>>of action is clearly present by virtue of the Freedom of
>>>>
>>>>Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.
>>>>
>>>> Petitioners also conclude that the USDC's ORDER of April 8,
>>>>
>>>>1997, in the instant case, is erroneous for basing a remand upon
>>>>
>>>>a false premise, namely, that a civil petitioner/plaintiff does
>>>>
>>>>not have the power to remove a case to federal court.
>>>>
>>>> If allowed to stand, said ORDER will deny a remedy which
>>>>
>>>>belongs to Petitioners, and thereby cause irreparable damage(s)
>>>>
>>>>to Petitioners, for all the reasons stated above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dated: April 14, 1997
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Respectfully submitted,
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>>>
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
>>>>(expressly not a citizen of the United States),
>>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator on behalf of
>>>>the People of the United States of America
>>>>All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 8 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PROOF OF SERVICE
>>>>
>>>>I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona state,
>>>>
>>>>federal witness, and Counselor at Law, do hereby certify, under
>>>>
>>>>penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of
>>>>
>>>>America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years
>>>>
>>>>of age, a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and
>>>>
>>>>that I personally served the following document(s):
>>>>
>>>> MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
>>>> MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF
>>>> CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY
>>>> OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE:
>>>> 28 U.S.C. 1447(d)
>>>>
>>>>by placing one true and correct copy of same in first class U.S.
>>>>
>>>>Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Attorney General William H. Rehnquist, C.J.
>>>>Department of Justice Supreme Court of the U.S.
>>>>10th and Constitution, N.W. 1 First Street, N.E.
>>>>Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C.
>>>>
>>>>Solicitor General Warren Christopher
>>>>Department of Justice U.S. Secretary of State
>>>>10th and Constitution, N.W. Department of State
>>>>Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C.
>>>>
>>>>James M. Burns LeRoy Michael; Schweitzer
>>>>United States District Court c/o Yellowstone County Jail
>>>>316 North 26th Street 3165 King Avenue, East
>>>>Billings, Montana state Billings, Montana state
>>>>
>>>>Office of the U.S. Attorneys Judge J. Clifford Wallace
>>>>United States District Court Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
>>>>Federal Building c/o P.O. Box 193939
>>>>Billings, Montana state San Francisco, California
>>>>
>>>>Chief Judge Judge Alex Kozinski
>>>>Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
>>>>c/o P.O. Box 193939 125 South Grand Avenue, #200
>>>>San Francisco, California state Pasadena, California state
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Executed on April 14, 1997:
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>>>
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
>>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 9 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> # # #
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>========================================================================
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>>>>email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
>>>>web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
>>>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
>>>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>>>>========================================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word
>>"subscribe" in the subject box.
>>==================================================================
>> EAGLEFLIGHT
>> ///, ////
>> \ /, / >. David E. Rydel
>> \ /, _/ /. *****
>> \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command
>> \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798
>> /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785
>> /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>> (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
>> // ````
>> ==============((`===================================================
>> A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA
>>
>>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the
>>phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>>
>>
>>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net>
>>To: "70277.2502" <70277.2502@compuserv.com>
>>Subject: Re: Foreign Troops
>>Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:10:08 +0200
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>>>From: Ralph <ralph@teaminfinity.com>
>>>Subject: Re: Foreign Troops
>>>To: eagleflt@flash.net (Dave Rydel)
>>>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 21:36:02 -0400 (EDT)
>>>Cc: MoKan99@aol.com
>>>
>>>Here is some of what I have. I will send more if you remind me. Also
please
>>>look at BORDER XXI. Please share whatever you have.
>>>
>>> ralph@TeamInfinity.com
>>>
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/bible
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html (updated)
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/irs.audit.html <-SCATHING GAO Audit of IRS
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/STW.ALL.html
>>>http://www.epa.gov/region09/cross_pr/usmex/index.htm <-- BORDER XXI (21)
>>>http://www.stw.ed.gov <---- GOVERNMENT's School to WORK Site
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>>>
>>>
>>>What you are about to read I obtained from David J. Smith who can be
reached
>>>at 1420 West Ross, Waxahachie Texas 75165. Would love more details from
>>>anyone who has them and VERIFICATION. ralph@TeamInfinity.com I basically
>>>have paraphrased what I saw on a raw Satellite broadcast of David's over 6
>>>months ago. The reason I bring it up now is that as time has passed
David's
>>>report herein paraphrased by me only seems to ring more and more true with
>>>COSCO border 21, Panama canal being controled by chinese, Luftwaffe in NEw
>>>Mexico etc etc. The details in the paraphrase by me of david's work are
>>>quite alarming to say the least. please excuse the spelling and grammatical
>>>probs, I wish we all had more time. Toodleloo, ralph@TeamInfinity.com
>>>
>>>
>>>11/94 Hawaian Islands:
>>>
>>> State S.W.A.T. team, against orders, came out to investigate 4
>>> Russian Generals conducting military maneavers involving Russian
>>> secret Speksnaz forces, Nepalese Gurkas all over the 5 Hawaian
>>> Islands.
>>>
>>>
>>>Speksnaz are highly trained forces who specialize in nuclear power,
>>>electrical power, and communications sabotage, and infiltration.
>>>
>>>Speksnaz for several years have been seen coming into US via Alaska, first
>>>one at a time, then 10 at atime, now, 100s at a time, to preassigned jobs
>>>here in the US.
>>>
>>>JFK in 1961 and 62, signed into law State Department Document 7277, a three
>>>step plan to completely and generally disarm the United States, we are now
>>>in step 2.
>>>
>>> 9/2/1992 - George Bush said: "US is prepared to make available our
>>> bases and lands for multinational field exercises. " Formerly
>>> defunct Fort Dix, in New Jersey is turned over for use by the
United
>>> Nations and converted into a base for UN "Peace" keeping training.
>>> There are signs on the base pointing to a Prisoner of War
Compound.
>>> I have seen video of this. Brand new razor wire on the ground
>>> surrounds many parts of this UN base.
>>>
>>>UN Charter - No such thing as "Peace Keeping" forces. They have the
>>>EXCLUSIVE "right" to declare ware anywhere in the world. Peace Keepers or
>>>War Mongerers ? If they have all the guns who can make war against the
>>>beast. (see rev 13:4). No one can of course.
>>>
>>> Fort Dix NJ, is a 50 sq mile base handed over to the United Nations
>>> Organization to train foreign troops there RENT FREE !!
>>>
>>> There are 19,000 United Nations Organization Troops in Fort Polk
>>> Louisiana, French and Pakastani, 2 Battalions of Russian soldiers,
>>> on war footing according to an insider of that compound who told
his
>>> parents, who also says this same compound has VAST underground
>>> facilities storing equipment and other materiel.
>>>
>>>NAPA California Sentinel reports 50,000 National Guard and United Nations
>>>Organization Troops based near Barstow California. Forces are held on
stand
>>>by in case of rioting in Los Angeles area.
>>>
>>> There are 40,000 United Nations Organization Foreign troops based near
>>> Sacremento California. Thes anti american Foriegn Soldiers are
>>> based nearby in El Dorado National Forest.
>>>
>>>Southern California, another hot bead of United Nations Organization
>>>military activity, bases more than 40,000 United Nations Organization
Troops
>>>in San Diego, another 22,000 combat ready UN troops stationed just south of
>>>Los Angeles.
>>>
>>>Thousands of Russian troops are stationed in secret military bases in
>>>Nevada, people have heard of Area 51 and there are other areas. They are
>>>under the auspices of the United Nations Organization, and a special
>>>instruction manual has already been written and passed out for russian
>>>soldiers in the United States. It teaches them how to do door to door
>>>siezures and searches and the correct procedure for weapons siezure. The
>>>manual is written for the russians.
>>>
>>>Can there be any doubt why the TROJAN horse, the united Nations, is on the
>>>soil of America ? It was placed here to takeover, subvert our soveriegnty
>>>for world government. The ONLY way they could get troops and equipment on
>>>American soil was through the United Nations Organization.
>>>
>>>Supposedly, by brainwashing the American people to believe that it was an
>>>organization to bring world peace instead of world tyranny and slavery.
>>>
>>>There is a 43,000 man United NAtions Organization battle group whihc is
>>>stationed in the Texas Pan Handle by Oklahoma and New Mexico, Anchorage
>>>Alaska has 14,000 United NAtions Troops dispersed throughout the area. And
>>>more are coming in every week. These Antiamerican soldiers wear black
>>>uniforms, they usually drive dark unmarked military vehicles.
>>>
>>>United Nations Organization Gurka troops from Nepal can be found near
Yakima
>>>Washington. These are very ruthless individuals known to be merciless
>>>killers. They are stationed at a U.S. military reservation known as the
>>>Yakima Firing Range.
>>>
>>>A 20,000 man contingent, once again UN Troops were kept in a state of alert
>>>during the Ruby Ridge siege on the Weaver family in Idaho. The plan was to
>>>have them to join with the US Marshalls if called upon by their bosses.
Why
>>>should our US leaders TREASONOUSLY offer to house and equip a hostile
>>>standing United NAtions Organization Standing army on an American Military
>>>base ? It's because NO ONE has called it treason against the people of this
>>>country. This opened the flood gates for 10s of thousands of Foreign
troops
>>>to pour into our country because no one says anything against it.
>>>
>>>Russian NAval transport ships have been spotted numerous times in the Gulf
>>>of California. Part of the Russian fleet is anchored with 4 floating dry
>>>docks near Gulf Port Mississippi. 4 Russian subs are docked with normal
>>>shipping in Alabama's Mobile Bay. These are equipped with 22
>>>Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles and each of these can hit 10 different
>>>targets in the United States.
>>>
>>>United States Service Personell are seeing foreign troops on military bases
>>>all over the nation. There are foreign military personnel on our bases and
>>>foreign troop movement and activity is going on in the Gulf of Mexico
>>>coastal region west of Gulf Port in Mississippi near the border of
>>>Louisiana, to be exact, United NAtions Organization troops wear vietnamese
>>>style uniforms, no insignias or emblems in some areas, these soldiers ride
>>>armed guard on barges going north of the Gulf up the Pearl River. the
Pearl
>>>River is a river that one would cross to get to Alabama or Florida from
that
>>>area. These barges are loaded with military equipment vehicles and
>>>supplies, their destination is the HUGE NASA Test Facility which borders
the
>>>Pearl River. United Nations Organization mercanaries, all of whom despise
>>>Americans such as you and me, because they are not in general Christian or
>>>moral, and have no conscious will to stop any orders against the American
>>>people who might be Christian or moral. They are quartered and undergoing
>>>special training at the NASA facility attached to the Pearl River.
Included
>>>are Russian, East German, Koreans and other nationalities. The Spotlight
>>>newspaer obtained several years ago irrefutable evidence, photographs, 100
>>>of photographs, showing THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of foreign military
vehicles
>>>and armour going ALL over the United States, including vehiles being
used by
>>>the UN. We even have film footage we have taken ourselves in Gulf Port
>>>Mississippi, and Beumont Texas, showing United NAtions Organization
vehicles
>>>on trucks being transported in this country.
>>>
>>>Our president Bill Clinton, has signed Executive Orders as well as other
>>>presidents before him, giving very wide ranging powers to the United
Nations
>>>Organizationto command our military forces. This means the National
>>>Security Council has now delegated these powers to the United NAtions
>>>Organization. Bill Clinton signed on July 15, 1996, Executive Order
13010.
>>>Within the context of this Exective Order it states VERY CLEARLY that if
>>>there is ANY type of emergency whatsover of terrorism, especially like a
>>>black out of electricity, that DOD has all the powers of the president.
>>>Well our nation basiclly has 9 separate power grids like TVA (Tennessee
>>>Valley Authority) that supply all the electrical power in the US. So 9 key
>>>positions need to be taken out and we will have the conditions necessary
for
>>>take over by law. (Who forgot about the massive power outs that occurred
>>>last year in the West ?)
>>>
>>>100s of Railroad flat cars bearing Russian military vehicles and armour and
>>>even some United NAtions Organization vehicles (painted white with UN
>>>letters) all over America, especially Colorado, Wyoming, Montana,
>>>Pennsylvania, Florida, and Nashville Tennessee, along Interstate 24, west
>>>of NAshville we recieved two calls telling us of HUGE fuselages with UN
>>>letters heading toward a military base. So yes they are all over.
>>>
>>>In Mississippi, 100s of Russian built military vehicles obtained from what
>>>was East Germany are, according to officials on the base (we attempted to
>>>tape the facilities when we were confronted by an official who explained to
>>>us the specifics herein) the vehicles were being refurbished under the
>>>auspices of the United Nations Organization. Without doubt. This MASSIVE
>>>depot in Gulf Port Mississippi, behind barbed wire, anybody can go there
can
>>>see it from Highway 49, 6-8 miles north of Interstate 10.
>>>
>>>20 miles of newly built road lead directly from this MASSIVE depot directly
>>>into NASA's Stennis Space Center. WHY ? Every American needs to know
why.
>>>Why are our representatives silent ? Many of the vehicles have been
spotted
>>>(we have pictures) are for chemical and biological warfare purposes. Why
>>>when this is banned by treaty ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>El Jeffe, El Capiton, Generalissimo Klintonista speaks out
>>> about the US Constitution:
>>>
>>>
>>>"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical
>>>Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of
>>>individual freedom to Americans ..."
>>>
>>>"And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When
>>>personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what
>>>we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing
>>>projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like
>>>that to try to make people safer in their communities."
>>>
>>>President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough"
>>>
>>>"We can't be so fixated on our desire
>>> to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..."
>>>
>>> Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)
>>>
>>>
>>> Why cant any of these be considered a violation of the oath of
>>> office to uphold the Constitution and qualify as TREASON !!
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>>>
>>> ralph@TeamInfinity.com (I can get you SAPF films/tapes/materials,
>>> "Harry's War" the suppressed film, Tragedy & Hope the book,
>>> US/UN/DontTreadonMe FLAGS, bumperstickers YardSigns & T-Shirts,
>>> inquire)
>>>
>>> http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/code/t26.html
>>>
>>> http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html
>>>
>>>
>>> This correspondence in NO WAY represents Save A Patriot Fellowship
>>> (SAPF), but feel free to contact them thru RALPH & Andrew C. Earp
>>>
>>> 1-800-677-1207 ext. 1800 RALPH and ANDREW C. EARP
>>> Andrew C. Earp is NATIONAL DIRECTOR of SEMINAR SERVICES
>>>
>>> Let me know if you want to receive email on a regular basis
>>>
>>> CALL 703-904-7770 ask for document 777
>>>#########################################################################
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >Return-Path: <MoKan99@aol.com>
>>>> >From: MoKan99@aol.com
>>>> >Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:15:51 -0400 (EDT)
>>>> >To: Eagleflt@flash.net
>>>> >Subject: Foreign Troops
>>>> >
>>>> >Writer seeks information on the following topics:
>>>> >
>>>> >1) Foreign troops on US soil
>>>> >2) Biosphere program
>>>> >3) Federal detention centers
>>>> >
>>>> >Looking for specifics; i.e. locations, dates, numbers, recent
>activities -
>>>> >who, what, when, where, why...
>>>> >
>>>> >Contact B. Menninger
>>>> >PH. 816-561-5527
>>>> >E-Mail MoKan99@AOL.COM
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word
>>>> "subscribe" in the subject box.
>>>> ==================================================================
>>>> EAGLEFLIGHT
>>>> ///, ////
>>>> \ /, / >. David E. Rydel
>>>> \ /, _/ /. *****
>>>> \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command
>>>> \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798
>>>> /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785
>>>> /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>>>> (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
>>>> // ````
>>>> ==============((`===================================================
>>>> A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA
>>>>
>>>> To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With
the
>>>> phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word
>>"subscribe" in the subject box.
>>==================================================================
>> EAGLEFLIGHT
>> ///, ////
>> \ /, / >. David E. Rydel
>> \ /, _/ /. *****
>> \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command
>> \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798
>> /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785
>> /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>> (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
>> // ````
>> ==============((`===================================================
>> A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA
>>
>>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the
>>phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>>
>>
>>
> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word
>"subscribe" in the subject box.
>==================================================================
> EAGLEFLIGHT
> ///, ////
> \ /, / >. David E. Rydel
> \ /, _/ /. *****
> \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command
> \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798
> /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785
> /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
> (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
> // ````
> ==============((`===================================================
> A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA
>
>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the
>phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail