FORMAL REQUEST FOR REFERRAL TO ADR

FORMAL REQUEST FOR REFERRAL TO

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

TO: Hon. Steven T. Mnuchin

Secretary of the Treasury

Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington 20220

District of Columbia, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964; and,

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

DATE: April 14, 2017 A.D.

SUBJECT: Administrative Tort Claim to the Office of Chief Counsel,

Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter “IRS Tort Claim”)

Greetings Secretary Mnuchin:

I am writing specifically to request formal referral of my pending IRS Tort Claim to the most appropriate alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) option, as fully authorized by Acts of Congress including but not limited to 28 U.S.C. section 2672 (to settle any tort claim against the United States).

I also write to make a record of facts which call for the conclusion that my IRS Tort Claim has been and continues to be obstructed, resulting in further tortious damages to my good name and estate.

Very briefly, after submitting a series of FOIA Requests for the credentials required of certain personnel claiming to be employed by the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, with very few exceptions all such personnel turned up with missing and fatally defective credentials.

The attached documents constitute material evidence that credentials required by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution, and by Acts of Congress which have implemented that Clause, have turned up either missing or fatally defective for the personnel identified in the attached document titled “Progress to Date Requesting Credentials for Suspects in the IRS Targeting Scandal (aka Lois Lerner Scandal)”.

In particular, William J. Wilkins failed to disclose valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS, and no SENATE CONFIRMATION or PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION were disclosed for him either. As such, he lacked any and all authority to make any decisions whatsoever concerning my timely Federal Tort Claim as received by the IRS Office of Chief Counsel on July 11, 2016.

As such, the latter hirelings are now suspected of committing multiple acts of mail fraud, impersonation and racketeering, in violation of the Federal criminal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 1341, 912 and 1962, respectively. Please know that mail fraud is also defined as a RICO “predicate act” at 18 U.S.C. 1961; and, any two (2) such predicate acts are defined as a pattern of racketeering activity at 1961(5).

In order to minimize unnecessary postage expenses and printing costs, please feel free to access the Internet versions of all relevant documents, which are easily accessible at their corresponding URLs.

Executive Recommendation

Given the painfully obvious delays and well documented obstructions which have now occurred with all five (5) of my pending Federal Tort Claims (U.S. DOJ Standard Forms 95), I now believe that arbitration, mediation or other alternative dispute resolution technique should be authorized for my IRS Tort Claim, in a prompt delegation from the Secretary of the Treasury to a fair and impartial “neutral” as presently defined by Act of Congress at 5 U.S.C. 573.

We also take this opportunity to object to any and all Federal policy(s) which presently require formal litigation to be commenced BEFORE any ADR options can be invoked.

In our professional opinion, such policies appear to defeat the stated intent of Congress to provide damaged parties with practical alternatives to expensive and time-consuming litigation.

In this context, please refer in particular to the Congressional Findings as stated in the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, Public Law 104-320, 110 Stat. 3870, October 19, 1996, to wit:

The Congress finds that --

(1) administrative procedure ... is intended to offer a prompt, expert, and inexpensive means of resolving disputes as an alternative to litigation in the Federal courts ....

[bold emphasis added]

Thank you very much, Secretary Mnuchin, for your prompt decision to refer this matter to the most appropriate ADR option, pursuant to the intent of Congress expressed at 28 U.S.C. 2672 and in the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 supra.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964; and,

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.