William Michael, Kemp, Sui Juris
c/o General Delivery
Gadsden, Alabama state
non-domestic zip code exempt

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice







               DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

              NORTHERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

                         MIDDLE DIVISION


STATE OF ALABAMA [sic]       )  Case No. #CV-97-H-0022-M
                             )
          Plaintiff [sic]    )  16th Cir. Case #CC-95-1083-DWS
                             )
     v.                      )  NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
                             )  MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
WILLIAM MICHAEL KEMP  [sic], )  Rule 201(d), Federal Rules
                             )  of Evidence;  Full Faith and
          Defendant [sic]    )  Credit Clause; P.L. 91-375,
_____________________________)  Section 403


COMES NOW  William Michael,  Kemp, Sui  Juris, Citizen of Alabama

state, expressly  not a  citizen of  the United  States ("federal

citizen"),  and   Defendant  in   the   above   entitled   action

(hereinafter  "Defendant"),  to  provide  formal  Notice  to  all

interested parties  of His  Demand, made  hereby pursuant to Rule

201(d) of  the Federal  Rules of Evidence, for mandatory judicial

notice  of  the  attached  documentation  and  legal  authorities

concerning the  United States Postal Service ("USPS") and the use

of Zone  Improvement Program  ("ZIP") codes  on first class mail.

This honorable  Court is  respectfully requested  to take  formal

judicial notice  of P.L.  91-375,  Section  403.    The  attached

documentation is incorporated by reference as if set forth fully.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 1 of 23


                   S A M P L E    L E T T E R

To Whom It May Concern:

Please kindly correct your records to show that I am located at:

               NON-DOMESTIC
               c/o ______________ Street
               City/Town, State (spell out full name)
               zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)


     Since the  use of  ZIP codes is voluntary (see Domestic Mail
Service Regulations,  Section 122.32),  the U.S.  Postal  Service
cannot discriminate against the non-use of ZIP codes, pursuant to
the Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403 (Public Law 91-375).

     The federal  government attempts  to assert  jurisdiction by
sending letters with ZIP codes, when jurisdiction would otherwise
be lacking.   The receipt and "acceptance" of mail with ZIP codes
is one  of the  requirements for the Internal Revenue Service, in
particular, to  have jurisdiction  to send notices.  In fact, the
IRS has  adopted ZIP  code areas as "Internal Revenue Districts".
See the  Federal Register,  Volume 51,  Number 53, for Wednesday,
March 19, 1986.

     The federal  government  cannot  bill  a  __________________
State Citizen because such a Citizen is not within the purview of
the  District   of  Columbia,  its  territories,  possessions  or
enclaves.    As  a  group,  these  areas  are  now  uniquely  and
collectively identified  as "the  federal zone",  as explained in
the book entitled The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal
Revenue, San Rafael, Account for Better Citizenship, 1992.

     Your immediate  cooperation in  this  matter  will  be  most
appreciated.


Signed with explicit reservation of all my rights
and without prejudice to any of my rights,

/s/ John Q. Doe
__________________________________________________

John Q. Doe, _______________________ state Citizen
Nonresident Alien with respect to The Federal Zone
(D.C., its territories, possessions and enclaves)


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 2 of 23


            ZIP Code Use Invokes Federal Jurisdiction

                          Vol. I, No. 6


     Use of  the ZIP  Code  is  voluntary.    See  Domestic  Mail
Services Regulations,  Section 122.32.  You should also know that
the Postal service cannot discriminate against the non-use of the
ZIP Code.   See "Postal Reorganization Act", Section 403, (Public
Law 91-375).     The federal  government utilizes the ZIP code to
prove that  you reside  in a "federal district of the District of
Columbia".   This is  why the  IRS and  other government agencies
(state  and   federal)  require  a  ZIP  Code  when  they  assert
jurisdiction by  sending you  a letter.   They  claim  that  this
speeds the  mail, but this is a sly and subtle TRICK.  It is also
prima facie  evidence that  you are  a subject  of Congress and a
"citizen of the District of Columbia" who is "resident" in one of
the several States.

     The  receipt  of  mail  with  a  ZIP  code  is  one  of  the
requirements for  the  IRS  to  have  jurisdiction  to  send  you
notices.   The government  cannot bill  a Citizen  of California,
because he is not within the purview of the MUNICIPAL LAWS of the
District of  Columbia.  In fact, the Internal Revenue Service has
adopted the  ZIP code  areas as  Internal Revenue Districts.  See
the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53 , Wednesday, March 19,
1986.

     You must  remember that  the Postal  Service  is  a  private
corporation, a quasi-governmental agency.  It is no longer a full
government agency.   It  is like  the Federal Reserve System, the
Internal Revenue Service, and the United States Marshall Service.
They  are   all  outside   the  restrictions   of   the   Federal
Constitution, as  private corporations.  They are all powerful in
their respective  areas of  responsibility to  enforce collection
for the  federal debt.   So, if you are using a ZIP code, you are
in effect  saying openly  and notoriously that you do not live in
the State  of California,  but, instead  are a  resident  in  the
california area of the District of Columbia (a federal district).
There are  some so-called  Patriot groups  that I  consider to be
patriots for  money.   They advocate  the use  of Title  42 suits
(which are  for federal  citizens only),  send mail to you with a
ZIP Code,  and ask  you to  do things  that place  you within the
municipal jurisdiction of the District of Columbia.

     Remember these  individuals may  be agents of the government
or, even  worse, are advocating a one-world government by the use
of the Social Security number and the ZIP code.

     So you  must be  aware of  the movement  towards a one-world
government through  annihilation or elimination of State Citizens
by use of the so-called 14th Amendment and its related laws.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 3 of 23


     This movement  can be  halted by  the efforts of everyone to
return to  the status  of Primary  State Citizens.  By becoming a
State Citizen and not a citizen of the United States, you can get
the federal government off your back and out of your billfold.

     Speaking for  myself, I  want the  Original Constitution for
the United States of America  put  back  in  force,   as  applied
against the  federal government, and the States restored to their
original status as Republics.

     So, all  you have  to do  is to  study  and  determine  your
status, whether  you are  a "slave"  and a  second-class  citizen
(commonly referred  to as  a "federal  citizen"), or  a Sovereign
State Citizen (e.g. of California).

     You must decide who and what you are!!!!!


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 4 of 23


                                   c/o General Delivery
                                   San Rafael, California
                                   Postal Zone 94901/tdc

                                   August 16, 1992

Eileen Casady
Mill Valley Post Office
751 E. Blithedale
Mill Valley, California state
Postal Zone 94941-9998/tdc

Dear Eileen:

     Thank you for your interest in our research.  Yesterday, you
may recall  that you  asked me about my use of the letters "/tdc"
after ZIP  codes.   I am  sorry that the Post Office was too busy
for us to discuss it on the spot.  I want you to know that I have
noticed the  cheerful efficiency  with which you serve the public
at your  counter, and  do so with remarkable consistency.  So, it
is with  great pleasure that I am now able to return the favor of
your kindness and consideration.

     The problem  which I  am about  to describe  to you  has its
roots in  old Europe,  where many generations of banking families
made a  lucrative discovery centuries ago.  They found that banks
could profit  more by  loaning huge  sums to governments, than by
making lots  of small  loans to  individuals  like  you  and  me.
Governments, of  course, are  in a unique position to borrow huge
sums, and  they have  the police  power to extract repayment from
their people.

     In 1913,  our Congress  got in  bed with these same European
banking families  and passed  legislation which created a private
credit monopoly known as the Federal Reserve System.  This system
is no  more federal  than Federal Express.  Moreover, there is no
"Reserve".   These banks  are privileged to loan money which they
don't have,  through a  special privilege  known  as  "fractional
reserve  banking".    What  really  happened  was  that  Congress
extended to this monopoly the privilege of counterfeiting money.

     Congress benefits  from this monopoly by borrowing huge sums
from it  every year.  You see, for decades now, Congress has been
spending much  more money  than it  collects from  taxation.   It
"balances" the  budget every  year by  putting ink  on pieces  of
paper and calling them bonds.  These bonds are usually put up for
sale in  the open  bond market.   But  the federal  deficits have
become so  huge, there are not enough working people like you and
me to  buy up  all of these bonds every year.  So, Congress walks
across the  street to  the Federal  Reserve, which buys them from
Congress by  printing ink  on pieces  of paper  and calling  them
"Federal Reserve Notes".  Take a look in your wallet now, and you
will see  an example  of a  Federal Reserve Note (or "FRN").  The
New York  banking establishment  refers to these bills as Federal
Reserve Accounting Unit Devices (F-R-A-U-D).


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 5 of 23


     It is  bad enough that this private credit monopoly has been
given the  privilege to  "counterfeit"  money.    (They  call  it
"credit creation via bookkeeping entries".)  What makes the whole
scam so  intolerable is  that the  American people get stuck with
the interest payments.  Congress was forced, in effect, to "lien"
on the  land and  labor of  all Americans as collateral for these
huge bank loans.  Enter the Internal Revenue Service.  The IRS is
really just  a collection  agency for  the Federal Reserve banks.
The FED  pumps money  and credit  into the  economy, and  the IRS
sucks it  out of  the economy, like two pumps, working in tandem.
If we had only one pump injecting money into the economy, without
a balancing  pump to remove it from the economy, the value of our
dollar would  diminish rapidly  as inflation  climbed like  a sky
rocket into  the stratosphere.   This  happened in  Germany  just
prior to World War II, so the bankers learned an important lesson
from that grotesque experiment in hyper-inflation.

     What does  all this  have to  do with  ZIP codes,  you  ask?
Well, under  American Law  never repealed, Congress does not have
authority to  obtain controlling  interest in all Americans, such
that it  can compel  our specific  performance to  discharge  any
third-party  debt   or  obligation.     Imagine  walking  into  a
department store to buy a new toaster, and having the store clerk
send the  bill to  Willie  Brown.    In  this  example,  you  are
Congress;   the store  is the  Federal Reserve;  and Willie Brown
represents the  American people (some of the time).  Willie Brown
gets stuck  with a transaction to which he was never a party.  In
fact, he didn't even know about it!

     Congress needs to deceive Americans into believing that they
are all "subjects" of the "United States".  If you are subject to
the  jurisdiction  of  the  "United  States",  then  you  can  be
compelled to  pay taxes  which are used to discharge the interest
payable on the huge principal deficit which Congress has amassed.
But, here's  the rub.  The Supreme Court in 1945 defined the term
"United States"  to have  three separate  and distinct  meanings.
These meanings are:

     (1)  the  name   of  our  sovereign  nation,  occupying  the
          position of other sovereigns in the family of nations

     (2)  the federal  government and  the limited territory over
          which it exercises exclusive sovereign authority

     (3)  the collective  name for the States which are united by
          and under  the Constitution  for the  United States  of
          America


     The  second   of  these   three  definitions   is  the  most
interesting.   It includes  such areas of land as the District of
Columbia, Puerto  Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa,
but it  does NOT  include  the  50  States  of  the  Union,  like
California, and  Florida, and New York.  Now, if you were born in
one of  the 50  States of the Union, you were born outside of the
area defined  by the second definition of "United States" and you
are, therefore,  born a  free Sovereign.    A  Sovereign  is  the
opposite of a subject.  If you were born a Sovereign, there is no
way you  can be  "subject" to  the jurisdiction  of  the  "United
States" (unless  you volunteer),  particularly when  the  "United
States" in  this context  means only  the very  limited territory
over which  Congress exercises its exclusive authority.  Congress
does not  exercise exclusive  authority over any of the 50 States
of the  Union.   That's the  American Law  which has  never  been
repealed.   Unfortunately, the  Supreme Court's definition of the
three "United  States" was  written in  1945, at  the peak of the
first nuclear  war on  this planet.   People  had other things on
their minds!


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 6 of 23


     One of  the ways  in which  Congress deceives  all Americans
into  thinking   they  are   its   "subjects"   is   to   utilize
jurisdictional traps  like the  ZIP code.   In  the DMM, you will
find that  ZIP codes  are actually optional (see DMM 122.32).  If
we utilize  this optional  "benefit" which  Congress is providing
for  us,   we  are  presumed  to  be  volunteering  ourselves  as
"subjects" of  Congress.   That may sound pretty stupid, at first
glance, but  it gets worse.  Federal judges are now under so much
pressure to  keep the  money flowing  into the  banks, they  have
developed a  technique called "silent judicial notice".  That's a
fancy way  of saying  they don't  have to  tell you that you made
yourself a  subject of  Congress by  using ZIP  codes.   And  the
government is always fond of telling people that ignorance of the
law is no excuse.  But, of course, this is fraud and it's just as
illegal for  the government  to do  it as  it is  to  counterfeit
money.

     Now, we  finally arrive  at "/tdc".  You cannot be compelled
to honor  or perform under any contract if you were under threat,
duress, or  coercion when  you entered  the contract.   It's like
extortion:   you aren't really "cooperating" when someone extorts
your cooperation.   Actually,  a criminal commits a serious crime
against your person to extort your cooperation for anything.

     The ZIP  code is  like extortion, on a small but real scale.
Postal clerks tell us our mail will move a lot slower if we don't
use ZIP codes, and they are probably right.  You would know!  But
we have to pay the same amount for first class, whether or not we
use a  ZIP code,  and remember  that ZIP  codes  are  defined  as
optional in  the DMM.   So, if we use ZIP codes, our mail moves a
lot faster,  but the  federal government  is thereby  entitled to
treat us  as subjects  and force us to pay interest on their huge
federal deficit.   If we don't use ZIP codes, our mail moves much
slower (the "duress"), we still have to pay the full postage due,
but at  least we  avoid becoming  "subjects" of  Congress.  Being
free of Congress is our right as Americans, even when Congress is
nowhere nearly  as corrupt  as it is now.  In fact, I think it is
fair to  say that  in the  200+ years  of our  brief history as a
nation, this  is probably  the most corrupt Congress we have ever
had in America.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 7 of 23


     The way  around this  dilemma is  to  use  ZIP  codes  under
threat,  duress,  and  coercion.    Specifically,  we  are  being
threatened with  subjugation (slavery?) to Congress for utilizing
a neat  sorting scheme which expedites the delivery of everyone's
mail.  This threat also means that we did not enter the "ZIP code
contract" voluntarily,  because we  had to  pay the  full postage
regardless of  whether we used the ZIP code or not.  But at least
we retain  our right  to avoid  becoming a  slave to  the Federal
Reserve banks.

     The whole  situation would  be different  if  there  were  a
different rate  for mail  addressed without ZIP codes, and if the
federal government  would fully  disclose the jurisdictional trap
which it  has created  with ZIP  codes.  The federal government's
failure to  disclose fully  all the terms and conditions attached
to its  contracts means  that the federal government is guilty of
fraud, pure  and simple.   And  fraud  nullifies,  or  "vitiates"
everything it touches, all the way back to the beginning, even if
that's your  original birth  certificate, or  your original  SS-5
Social Security  application (not  the SSN  or SS  card, but  the
application for  an SSN).   Recall  now that the New York banking
establishment refers  to our  money as Federal Reserve Accounting
Unit Devices (F-R-A-U-D).

     For  your  information,  I  have  enclosed  some  additional
information on  this problem.   Please  feel free  to share these
materials with  anyone you  choose.   Our research  is  open  and
available to the public, because we have nothing to hide.  We are
passionate and  dedicated to  restoring Constitutional government
to America,  whereby  the  rights  of  individuals  are  supreme.
Governments at  all levels should be our public servants, because
we are  the public and they are the servants.  They should not be
permitted to  utilize threat,  duress, and coercion to extort our
cooperation with  their fraudulent  debt schemes.   It is just as
illegal for them to do it as it is for you and I to do it!

     Thanks so  much for  your interest  and for  keeping an open
mind at this most difficult time in our nation's history.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane
Account for Better Citizenship


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 8 of 23


                                   c/o General Delivery
                                   San Rafael, California
                                   Postal Zone 94901/tdc

                                   December 26, 1992

Eileen Casady
Mill Valley Post Office
751 E. Blithedale
Mill Valley, California state
Postal Zone 94941-9998/tdc

Dear Eileen:

     Happy Holidays to you!

     This letter  is a  follow-up to  my previous  letter to you,
dated August  16, 1992.  At that time, you may remember asking me
about my use of "/tdc" on mailing labels.

     Among other  things, in  my letter I explained how ZIP codes
do expedite  the delivery  of mail  (you would know!) and how the
unqualified use of ZIP codes creates a legal presumption that the
user is "subject" to Congress.  I also explained why a failure to
use ZIP codes can and does delay the delivery of mail.

     Enclosed please  find a  photocopy of  an envelope  which  I
recently received  in San  Rafael.  This envelope arrived with an
extra adhesive  sticker on  the front  of the  envelope with  the
following text:

                   YOUR MAIL HAS BEEN DELAYED
                     DUE TO INCORRECT ADRESS
                         AND/OR ZIPECODE

     As you  can see  from the attached photocopy, I have spelled
the words on this adhesive sticker exactly as they are shown.  By
any chance, does the USPS now refer to them as "zippy" codes?

     This photocopy is, therefore, conclusive proof that the U.S.
Postal Service  does discriminate  against  the  non-use  of  ZIP
codes, contrary  to the "Postal Reorganization Act", Section 403,
(Public Law 91-375).


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

John E. Trumane
Account for Better Citizenship

attachment


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 9 of 23


                       The ZIP Code Issue:
                 Excerpts from a Personal Letter

                               by

                         Howard Freeman

                        November 11, 1988


     Your letter asks for information on the ZIP Code pursuant to
something that  appeared in  the Justice  Times some time ago.  I
wish I  had in  my possession the article you refer to, so that I
could have  some idea  of what  you already  know, and could just
fill in  the details  of what you do not understand, but I do not
have that article, so I'll try to make the "ZIP Code Issue" clear
to you.

     There are  two entities,  or  nations,  called  "The  United
States".  One is the union of 50 independent States combined into
a 3-branch (Legislative, Executive & Judicial) Republican Form of
government under  a contract  called:  The Constitution  for  the
United States of America.   The Other is a 1-branch (Legislative)
Democracy,  which  arises  out  of  the  Constitutional  Contract
wherein  Congress   (the  Legislative   Branch  of  the  3-branch
Republic) was  given Exclusive  rule over  a body of people known
as:   The Residents  of the  District of  Columbia.  It should be
obvious to  anyone that,  when a  governing body  (in  this  case
Congress) has  "exclusive" rule over a people, you have a nation.
So, in  America, we  have a  small nation,  operating upon  Roman
Civil Law  principles, within a larger nation which operates upon
the principles  of the  Common Law,  and is limited in its powers
and authority  by the Constitutional Contract.  I could spend the
rest of  the day  explaining the  differences between Roman Civil
Law and  the Common  Law, but  instead I will enclose a tape with
this letter  to you, which will do that for me.  Please do me the
honor of  listening to  this tape  on both  sides.   Many  people
reply, upon  my inquiry  about the tape I sent to them, that they
are too  busy to  listen to  it, which remark I consider somewhat
insulting to  me, when  I have gone to the expense and trouble of
getting it into their hands.

     As you  know, the  Republic called  The  United  States,  is
limited  in  what  it  can  do  by  the  Constitution,  and  that
Constitution limited  its Congress to coining money out of silver
or  gold,   and  limited   its  borrowing   power  to  those  two
commodities.   The Legislative  Democracy  called:    The  United
States, using the same Congress as the Republic, only for its own
ends, has no limitation of any kind on what it might or might not
do, since Congress, working in behalf of the Legislative Party or
Democracy, has the power and authority to issue a paper currency,
and to  declare it to be a "legal tender" for all debt public and
private.  That Congress had no limitation in what it might borrow
either!   So the  National Debt that you hear so much about, came
from that  Congress's power  to borrow other than silver or gold,
which was bank credit from the International Banking Houses.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 10 of 23


     A Problem:   What  can the Bankers do?  Easy solution, since
their money  controls the  news media:   keep the citizens of the
Republic in  the dark,  get the  lawyers busy, and figure ways of
entrapment, so that the Citizens of the Republic would think that
it was  THEIR Congress that borrowed the bank credit, and that it
is their  problem to  pay the usury on that debt.  Steps of Legal
Trickery follow:

1.   The  14th Amendment, which  is based  upon Roman  Civil Law,
     supposedly replaced  the  4th Amendment, which is based upon
     the Common  Law.   That aspect of things is explained on the
     tape enclosed, so I won't go into it here.

2.   Have the  Congress of  the Republic  fail  in  its  duty  to
     provide a  medium of exchange for its Citizens, thus forcing
     them to  do their  trading in the "Legal Tender" paper which
     the  Congress   of  the   Legislative  Democracy   has  made
     available.   I will  skip a few other steps here, and get to
     the meat of the information you want, which concerns the ZIP
     Code issue.

3.   The Congress  of the Republic must be enticed to consolidate
     50 independent  States into  10, not so independent, Federal
     Regions.  (What Congress creates, Congress can control, is a
     legal principle.)   Now,  the same  Congress that  rules the
     Legislative Democracy  may  rule  the  10  Federal  Regions,
     provided the  citizens thereof  can be  kept asleep, and not
     claim   their   rights   under   the   Federal   and   State
     Constitutional Contracts.

4.   Have  the  Post Office Department separate  itself from  the
     Republic and,  in its  new independence,  create  two-letter
     abbreviations for  all States  (contrary to the lawful State
     abbreviations  established   by  the  Legislatures  of  most
     States) and have the Post Office Department require this new
     abbreviation on  all subsidized  mail, and suggest it on all
     first class mail, along with the ZIP Code.

5.   Page 11 of the ZIP Code Directory, which can be found in any
     Post Office, will tell you that the first digit of every ZIP
     Code number  indicates the  Federal Region in which the user
     resides.

6.   Now that  the majority  of the brainwashed public, belonging
     to the  Republic, are  educated  to  employ  the  two-letter
     abbreviations for  their  State,  which  abbreviations  were
     never adopted  by the State Legislatures as the lawful State
     abbreviations, those  using said abbreviation are not making
     a lawful claim of their State residency and, with the use of
     the ZIP  code in  connection with  the new  two-letter State
     abbreviation, they  are making  a lawful claim that they are
     residents of  the particular  Federal Region  in which  they
     reside, so  they can  now be ruled under Roman Civil Law and
     tried in the Admiralty Courts of the Legislative Democracy.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 11 of 23


7.   With all of that in place, the Income Tax, which is employed
     to  pay   the  Usury  on  the  National  Debt  owed  by  the
     Legislative Democracy,  now applies  to the  Citizens of the
     Republic who  fail to  properly claim  and  establish  their
     rights as Citizens of their respective States.

8.   It is  made to  appear "Progressive" in our Schools to refer
     to America  as a  "Democracy", and somewhat "Reactionary" to
     study the  State and  National Constitutions in our schools.
     This keeps the public ignorant of the fact that the Congress
     of the  "Republic" is  limited by  Contract from passing any
     penal statute  of compelled performance upon the Citizens of
     any State.   The  Internal Revenue  Code is all that type of
     statute, and  those statutes  ONLY apply to the residents of
     the District  of Columbia  (see Article 1, Section 8, Clause
     17 of  the U.S.  Constitution) and  also to  all  those  who
     stupidly fail  to claim  their  State  residency  and  allow
     themselves to  be given  to the  status of  citizens of  the
     United States  (meaning the  Legislative Democracy) claiming
     themselves to  be residents  of a  Federal Region  which  is
     ruled over by the Democracy under Roman Civil Law.


     The above is all needed information if you are to understand
the ZIP  Code issue.  I hope that I have not worn you out with my
explanation, as  I have done with others, who ask me questions of
depth, and who only want some shallow, one-sentence reply.

     One other  caution before I close:  The ZIP Code use, or non
use, is  NOT a  "silver bullet" solution to all problems, wherein
the Legislative  Democracy,  called  the  United  States,  forces
itself upon  you.    The  enclosed  tape  will  point  out  other
solutions.   To properly  handle oneself  in order to keep out of
Legislative  Article I Courts  exercising Legislative  Power, and
into the  Article III  Courts  of  the  Republic  which  exercise
Judicial Power,  is another whole study in itself.  Again, let me
repeat:   There Are  No Silver  Bullets for those who claim to be
too busy to study!


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 12 of 23


             Explanation of ZIP Code Address Purpose
                 (Version 910816Z;  rev. 081991)

                               by

                         W. C. Updegrave
                  c/o 300 Adams Street, Esterly
                      Reading, Pennsylvania
                  zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)


     It is this writer's opinion, both as a result of study, e.g.
of page 11 of the National Area ZIP Code Directory;  of 26 U.S.C.
7621;   of Section  4 of  the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number
53, of  Wednesday, March  19, 1986, Notices at pages 9571 through
9573;  of Treasury Delegation Order (TDO) 150-01;  of the opinion
in United  States v. LaSalle National Bank, 437 U.S. 298, 308, 98
S.Ct.2d 2357,  57 L.Ed.2d  221 (1978);   of 12 U.S.C. 222;  of 31
U.S.C. 103;   and as a result of my actual experience, that a ZIP
Code address  is presumed  to create  a "Federal jurisdiction" or
"market  venue"   or  "revenue  districts"  that  override  State
boundaries, taking  one who uses such modes of address outside of
a State  venue and  its constitutional  protections and  into  an
international, commercial  venue involving  admiralty concerns of
the "United  States", which is a commercial corporation domiciled
in Washington, D.C.

     More specifically,  looking at  the map  on page  11 of  the
National ZIP  Code Directory,  e.g. at  a local  post office, one
will see  that the first digit of a ZIP Code defines an area that
includes more  than  one  State.    The  first  sentence  of  the
explanatory paragraph  begins:   "A ZIP  Code is a numerical code
that  identifies   areas  within   the  United   States  and  its
territories for purposes of ..." [cf. 26 CFR 1.1-1(c)].  Note the
singular  possessive   pronoun  "its",   not  "their",  therefore
carrying the  implication that  it relates to the "United States"
as a  corporation domiciled  in the  District of Columbia (in the
singular sense),  not in  the sense of being the 50 States of the
Union (in the plural sense).  The map shows all the States of the
Union, but  it also  shows  D.C.,  Puerto  Rico  and  the  Virgin
Islands, making the explanatory statement literally correct.

     Properly construed,  ZIP Codes  can only  be  applicable  in
Federal territories  and enclaves  that may be located within the
50 States  of the  Union, and to the "United States" and District
of Columbia  and its  territories --  cf. Piqua  Bank v. Knoup, 6
Ohio 342, 404 (1856) and U.S. v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 63 (1936) to
the effect  that "in  every state  there are two governments; the
state and  the United States."  Therefore, ZIP Code addresses are
for the  corporate "United States" and its agents, for example, a
customs and duty collector at New York harbor, when they move out
into the  States of  the Union  to perform functions delegated to
the "United  States" by the National/Federal Constitution, or the
Pennsylvania  Department   of  Transportation,  Bureau  of  Motor
Vehicles, or a U.S. Congressman.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 13 of 23


     But, by  propaganda, misleading  information  and  seditious
syntax, government has gotten nearly everyone in the 50 States of
the Union  to use  ZIP modes  of  address,  and  that  creates  a
PRESUMPTION or  a PREJUDICIAL  ADMISSION that  one is  in such  a
Federal venue, or that one is such a government agent.

     In general,  it is  well settled  in  law  that  Income  Tax
Statutes apply  only  to  corporations  and  to  their  officers,
agents, and  employees acting  in their official capacities, e.g.
from Colonial  Pipeline Co.  v. Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 44 L.Ed.2d
1, 95 S.Ct. 1538 (1975):  "... However, all 'income tax statutes'
apply only  to state  created creatures  known as corporations no
matter whether state, local, or federal."  Since corporations act
only through  their officers,  employees, etc.,  the  income  tax
statutes  reach  out  to  them  when  acting  in  their  official
capacities, but not as individuals.  This is the real purpose for
Identifying Numbers  -- cf.  26 CFR  301.6109-1(d) &  (g) and  26
U.S.C. 6331(a) and 26 CFR 301.6331-1, Part 4.

     Use of  a ZIP Code address is tantamount to the admission of
being  a  "citizen of the United States" who does not necessarily
have the  protections  of  the  first  eight  Amendments  to  the
Constitution (in  the  Bill of Rights)  when proceeded against by
Federal or  State authority  -- Maxwell  v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581, 20
S.Ct. 448  (1900), but,  "All the  provisions of the constitution
look to  an indestructible union of indestructible states", Texas
v. White,  7 Wall.  700;  U.S. v. Cathcart, 25 F.Case No. 14,756;
In re  Charge to  Grand Jury,  30 F.  Case No.  18,273  (65  C.J.
Section 2) -- not known to be overturned.


                             #  #  #


Also available from the same author:

"Brief of Law for ZIP Code Implications," by W. C. Updegrave, c/o
300 Adams Street  Esterly,  Reading,  NON-DOMESTIC,  Pennsylvania
(11 pages plus "Appendix of Unused Data and Quotes")


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 14 of 23


           My Continuing Objection to Mail Sent with a
             National Area ZIP Code Mode of Address

                               by

                         W. C. Updegrave
                  c/o 300 Adams Street, Esterly
                      Reading, Pennsylvania
                  zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)


     1.   In spite  of my  repeated demands  that you correct the
way in which you send mail to me, you insist and persist, over my
most strenuous  objections and contrary to my repeated NOTICES to
you, to  continue to  send my mail with a National Area ZIP Code,
which is  both unnecessary,  even by  the application of Domestic
Mail statutes  and regulations,  and is, in fact, an unlawful and
fraudulent attempt  to define  me into an alien and foreign venue
and jurisdiction  that are,  as a matter of fact, contrary to the
Federal and  State  Constitutions  and  the  case  law  that  has
developed on  this issue.   Briefly  put,  on  the  basis  of  my
studies, such  an address  can only  properly  apply  to  Federal
enclaves within  the States  of the  Union, and  perhaps to  14th
Amendment citizens  of the United States.  For this reason alone,
you are  either making  a mistaken or a fraudulent presumption as
to my status.  How would you prefer to be classified:  as one who
made an error?  or one who has committed acts of fraud?  If it is
fraudulent, then  you are also engaged in a conspiracy against me
and mine.   All  such mail  is reviewed without prejudice but not
accepted.

     2.   My use of the term "without prejudice, U.C.C. 1-207" in
connection with  my signature  on this  document,  or  any  prior
document or  instrument, indicates  that  I  have  exercised  the
remedy provided for me in the Uniform Commercial Code, Article I,
Section 207,  whereby I  have reserved  my natural and common law
right  not  to  be  compelled  to  perform  under  any  contract,
commercial  agreement,   or  bankruptcy  that  I  did  not  enter
knowingly, voluntarily  and intentionally, and reserved all other
Uniform Commercial  Code  and  common  law  remedies.    It  also
indicates that I do not intend to ratify any fraudulently induced
contract  by   continued  acceptance  of  the  benefits  thereof.
Furthermore,  it   notifies  all   administrative   agencies   of
government that  I do  not and  will  not  accept  the  liability
associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract,
commercial agreement or bankruptcy.

     3.   Briefly put,  Domestic Mail  Manual (DMM) Section 111.2
and the  copyrighted (hence,  "private" and  not governmental  at
all) NATIONAL AREA ZIP CODE DIRECTORY, page 11, both identify the
term  "United  States"  by  using  the  third  person,  singular,
personal pronoun "its", which relates only to the "United States"
at the  District of Columbia, its territories and ceded enclaves,
its agents  and its  "citizens".    In  this  context,  the  term
"citizen of  United States"  has a  very restricted definition --
cf.   26 C.F.R. 1.1-1(c) and 301.6109(g);  42 U.S.C. 1981 & 1982;
26 U.S.C. 3121(e);   26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) & (10);  etc.  It is to


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 15 of 23


be noted that in DMM 111.2, the term "United States" is used, but
none of the fifty states as the States in the Union is mentioned;
therefore,  the  maxim  expressio  unius  est  exclusio  alterius
(mention of  one thing  implies the  exclusion of others) becomes
applicable.   The 1789 Federal/National Constitution always makes
a distinction  between the  "States in the Union" and the "United
States", the  former always  being referenced  in the plural, and
the latter  sometimes being  so referenced.   The "United States"
has no  venue or  jurisdiction within  unceded territories inside
the "States in the Union" (e.g. see Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 44
U.S. (3 How.) 212, 221, 223 (1845);  New Orleans v. U.S., 35 U.S.
(10 Pet.)  662, 737  (1836);   4 U.S.C. 72;  48 U.S.C. Chapters 2
and 3,  "The  Alaska  and  Hawaii  Omnibus  Acts";    18  U.S.C.,
Appendix, FRCrP Rules 1 and 54(c);  etc.) except where a man or a
corporation can  be presumed  to be  a  "citizen  of  the  United
States" (see  26 C.F.R.  1.1-1(a), (b)  and (c)),  or a  "Federal
citizen", or a "National citizen" (see U.S. v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252,
102 S.Ct.  1051, 71  L.Ed.2d 127  (1982), stating  that  National
("United   States")    citizenship   mandates   Social   Security
participation, but  the issues of jurisdiction and venue were not
raised  in   that  case,   and  it   was  argued  on  narrow  and
inappropriate statutory  grounds --  cf. the  dissent in Maine v.
Thiboutot, 448  U.S. 1,  65 L.Ed.2d  555, 100  S.Ct. 2502 (1980),
pages 30-31 especially).

     "All legislation is prima facie territorial."

                        [American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.]
                                  [213  U.S. 347, 356-357 (1909)]


     "Legislation is  presumptively territorial  and confined  to
     limits over which the law-making power has jurisdiction."

                          [New York Central R.R. Co. v. Chisholm]
                                      [268 U.S. 29, 31-32 (1925)]


     ...  [T]he   "canon  of   construction  which  teaches  that
     legislation of  Congress, unless  a contrary intent appears,
     is meant  to apply  only within the territorial jurisdiction
     of the United States ...."

                              [U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217, 222]
                                             [70 S.Ct. 10 (1949)]


     4.   Without getting  into the  several definitions  of  the
term "citizen",  which the  courts generally  construe to  mean a
mere civil status for one who is politically involved, McCafferty
v.  Guyer,  59  Pa.  109,  126-127  (Agnew  dissent),  etc.,  but
sometimes the  term is  limited to  a representative of a city in
Parliament, or  one who  is involved  in the  conduct and  policy
making of  a civil government, the following is certain authority
on the  subject for  those who are in that category.  Persons who
are "citizens  of the  United States" do not necessarily have all


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 16 of 23


the protections  of  the  first  eight  amendments  to  the  U.S.
Constitution  when   proceeded  against   by  federal  and  state
authorities (e.g., see Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581, 20 S.Ct. 448
(1900)).  One of the elements that can lead to such presumptions,
by inference,  is the  acceptance of mail with a ZIP code mode of
address.   In Hooven  & Allison  v. Evatt,  324 U.S. 652, 671-672
(1945), the  U.S. supreme  Court has  ruled that  there are three
recognized meanings for the term "United States", to wit:

     The term  "United States"  may be used in any one of several
     senses.   It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying
     the position  analogous to  that of  other sovereigns in the
     family of  nations.   It may  designate the  territory  over
     which the  sovereignty of  the United  States extends, or it
     may be the collective name of the states which are united by
     and under the Constitution./6

     _______________

     6.   See Langdell,  "The Status  of our New Territories," 12
     Harvard Law  Review 365,  371;   see also  Thayer, "Our  New
     Possessions," 12  Harvard Law  Review  464;    Thayer,  "The
     Insular Tariff  Cases in  the Supreme Court," 15 Harvard Law
     Review 164;   Littlefield,  "The Insular  Cases," 15 Harvard
     Law Review 169, 281.


But, those  three meanings  are simply evidence of the word games
that the  courts, legislatures  and bureaucrats  have played with
the minds  and rights  of the  freemen in this country.  See also
the clear admission in Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855).

     5.   The map  on page 11 of the ZIP CODE DIRECTORY indicates
that ZIP code denominators combine more than one of the States of
the Union,  hence they  define a special venue related to revenue
districts established, for example, by 26 U.S.C. 7621(a) and (b),
and those  are the  only legitimate  purposes for  such a mode of
address.   For instance,  the ZIP  codes that  denominate certain
areas in  the States of New York and Pennsylvania all use a five-
digit ZIP  code, the  first numeral  of which  begins with a "1",
e.g. "19600".   On  page 15,  ibid., a  list is  given  of  state
abbreviations with two capital letters, to be used in conjunction
with ZIP codes.

     6.   Contrary to  popular belief, "citizenship of the United
States" arises  from the  so-called 14th  Amendment, and  did not
exist  before  that  fraudulent  enactment  was  foisted  on  the
unsuspecting free men (see Utah v. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936 (1975);
Dyett  v.   Turner,  439  P.2d  266,  272  (1968);    Adamson  v.
California, 332 U.S. 46 et seq. (1947);  Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal.
300 (1855);   Van  Valkenberg v.  Brown, 43  Cal. 43,  47 (1872);
U.S. v.  Anthony, 24 Fed. Case No. 14,459 at 830 (1873);  Cory et
al. v.  Carter, 48  Ind. 327,  349-350, 17  Am. Rep.  738 (1874);
Sharon v.  Hill, 26  Fed. Reporter  337 at  343-344;    State  v.
Manuel, 20  N.C. 144,  152;   Arver v. U.S., 245 U.S. 366, 388-89
(1917);   Hague v.  C.I.O., 307  U.S. 496, 509 (1938)).  In fact,
such  statutory  provisions   as  42 U.S.C. 1981  and  1982,  now


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 17 of 23


codified in  the same  title of  the U.S.  Codes  as  the  Social
Security Act  (so  called),  still  clearly  make  a  distinction
between "citizen of the United States" and "white state citizen".

It is  also clear  from various other authorities that there is a
distinction  between   state  citizenship  for  whites  and  14th
Amendment citizenship  of the  United States,  since even  such a
distinction can  be drawn  from the language of the infamous 14th
Amendment itself.   In  Cory v. Carter, supra, quoting and basing
its analysis  on the  opinion in  the Slaughter  House Cases,  16
Wall. 36, the court, with respect to the First Section, said:

     "... [I]t  overturns the  Dred Scott  decision by making all
     persons born  within the  United States  and subject  to its
     jurisdiction citizens  of the  United States.  That its main
     purpose was  to establish  the citizenship  of the negro can
     admit of  no doubt."  ...   It recognizes  and establishes a
     "distinction between  citizenship of  the United  States and
     citizenship of a State."
                                                 [emphasis added]


However, with  reference to  the second clause, that same opinion
continues:

     This clause  does not  refer to  citizens of the States.  It
     embraces only  citizens of the United States.  It leaves out
     the words  "citizen of  the State,"  which is  so  carefully
     used, and  used in  contradistinction  to  citizens  of  the
     United States,  in the  preceding sentence.   It  places the
     privileges and  immunities of  citizens of the United States
     under the protection of the Federal Constitution, and leaves
     the privileges  and immunities  of citizens of a State under
     the protection  of the  State constitution.   This  is fully
     shown by  the recent  decision of  the Supreme  Court of the
     United States in the Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36.

                                                 [emphasis added]


     7.   There are  lots of  reasons  to  believe,  e.g.  by  an
examination  of  42  U.S.C.  1982  (which  distinguishes  between
"citizens of the United States" and "white state citizens"), that
Taney's dicta in the Dred Scott case was not really overturned by
the 14th  Amendment, and  lots of authorities to show that it was
never validly adopted  or  ratified and  that, in  fact, the 14th
Amendment  did   not  repeal   any  part  of  the  original  1789
Constitution for the United States of America.

     Therefore, please  state concisely,  with supporting points,
rationale and authority:  What are the underlying presumptions by
which you send me mail using such a mode of address?


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 18 of 23


Recorded Delivery #A 004 341 049
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state
                                        zip code exempt
                                        (DMM 122.32)

                                        November 14, 1992

Disclosure Officer
Internal Revenue Service
Agents of Foreign Principals
c/o P. O. Box 2900
Sacramento, California

Subject:  NOTICE and DEMAND

Dear Disclosure Officer:

     I am  writing this NOTICE and DEMAND letter as a courtesy to
inform you  that I  have refused  a letter from your office which
was deposited  today in  USPS Post  Office Box  xxxx, San Rafael,
California.  This letter was refused and rejected, unopened, with
written instructions  to RETURN  TO SENDER  as shown at the upper
left corner of the envelope.

     Evidently,  you   have  chosen   to   ignore   the   mailing
instructions which  are clearly stated on page 2 of my Freedom of
Information Act  request, dated October 23, 1992 (a copy of which
is attached,  for your  information).   I  have  highlighted  the
mailing location  which you  must use in order to correspond with
me in writing.

     I am  forced to  conclude, therefore,  that your  deliberate
refusal  to   follow  these   simple   and   reasonable   mailing
instructions is  evidence of  your bad  faith in  this matter and
constitutes proof  of your  failure to  comply  with  all  stated
requirements of  my lawful  FOIA request.   You are hereby warned
that you  are under  the legal obligation of good faith, and that
bad faith on your part is synonymous with fraud.

     Please also  be advised that I will be happy to receive (but
not accept)  mail from  you, provided  that it  conforms  to  the
requirements as  stated in my Freedom of Information Act request.
These requirements  must be met by your use of the proper mailing
destination on  envelopes and  on all  correspondence  and  other
documents enclosed within mailing envelopes.

     Finally, I  hereby demand written confirmation from you that
the receipt  and use  of envelopes  and their  contents with  ZIP
codes and/or  two-letter federal  abbreviations (e.g., "CA") does
NOT grant  jurisdiction  over  State  Citizens  to  the  Internal
Revenue Service,  the "United  States" or  any of  its  agencies,
assigns or instrumentalities.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 19 of 23


     This written  confirmation must  be signed in pen and ink by
you, with  your true  and  correct  name/identification  (not  an
alias), under  penalties of  perjury, as  required of  you by  26
U.S.C. 6065.

     I am  making this  demand because  I am  a California  State
Citizen (see  1:2:3, 4:2:1  and 3:2:1 in the Constitution for the
United States  of America).   I  am not  a "citizen of the United
States".   You are  expected to  know the  Law in this California
Republic which  has been  interpreted by  the California  Supreme
Court as follows:

     A citizen  of any one of the States of the union, is held to
     be, and  called a  citizen of  the United  States,  although
     technically and  abstractly there  is no  such  thing.    To
     conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen
     of some  one of  the States, is totally foreign to the idea,
     and inconsistent  with the  proper construction  and  common
     understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution,
     which must  be deduced  from its  various other  provisions.
     The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power
     of naturalization,  was to  make citizens  of the respective
     States.
                            [Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)]
                                                 [emphasis added]


     Please be  advised  that  any  attempts  to  trick,  entice,
coerce, inveigle,  ensnare or cajole me into accepting, under the
Uniform Commercial  Code, any  mail addressed in any manner other
than that  specified in  my original FOIA, in an unlawful attempt
on your  part to  grant jurisdiction  over me  to some  arbitrary
federal district, will be further evidence of bad faith for which
you may  be sued, in the event that you attempt to do anything on
the basis of such incorrectly addressed mail or correspondence.

     Thank  you   in  advance   for   your   good   faith,   your
consideration, and your cooperation in this matter.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane
Sovereign California Citizen

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

enclosure:  true and correct copy of
            Freedom of Information Act
            request, dated 10/23/92


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 20 of 23


Certified Mail #P 840 292 047
Return Receipt Requested
                                             c/o General Delivery
                                             San Rafael
                                             California state

                                             October 23, 1992

Mr. Raymond A. Spillman
District Director
Internal Revenue Service
P. O. Box 2900
Sacramento, California

Re:  Freedom of Information Act Request

Dear Mr. Spillman:

     This is  a request under the Freedom of Information Act, and
my formal  written response to your letter to me, dated September
24, 1992, a copy of which is attached for your information.

     Without dishonor,  I hereby request that you provide me with
true and correct copies of the following:

     (1)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination that  I am a "United States citizen" or a
          "citizen of the United States";

     (2)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination that  I am "subject" to any provisions of
          the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and its regulations;

     (3)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination that I am an "individual" as that term is
          used in Part I, Section 1 of the IRC;

     (4)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination  that  I  am  one  of  the  "individuals"
          described in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of your letter;

     (5)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination that I am a "person liable" for any taxes
          imposed by the IRC and its regulations;

     (6)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination that I am a "person required" to make and
          file a return;

     (7)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination that  I am  now receiving, or have in the
          past received, "taxable income";

     (8)  all documents  on  which  you  based  your  presumptive
          determination that  I am  a "taxpayer"  as that term is
          defined in the IRC;

     (9)  your identification  and evidence  of your authority to
          make and  present presumptive  determinations about me,
          such as  those contained  in your attached letter dated
          "SEP 24 1992", per U.C.C. Section 3-505.


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 21 of 23


     You are  hereby placed  on actual  notice that  I explicitly
reserve my  right to rebut any and all factual presumptions which
you have made in support of your letter to me.

     In your  letter, you  stated that  you "will  not respond to
future letters  concerning these same issues".  I must remind you
that the  Freedom of  Information Act  (5 U.S.C.  552(a) et seq.)
does not give you any choice in this matter.

     The law  mandates that  you supply  me with  the information
requested.   The documents which I am requesting are not exempted
from disclosure.

     I am willing to pay fees for this request up to a maximum of
$20.   If you  estimate that  the fees  will exceed  this  limit,
please inform  me first  by writing  to me,  care of  the mailing
location described below.

     I fully  expect and demand a response to this request within
the  statutory   time  limits,   as  set   forth  in   5   U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i).

     Please send your timely, written response, signed in pen and
ink, to the following location:

                         John E. Trumane
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state
                  NON-DOMESTIC zip code exempt

     Thank you  very much for your kind and earnest consideration
of this  request, and  for your  due diligence  in providing  the
documents itemized above.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

attachment:  copy of your letter to me dated "SEP 24 1992"


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 22 of 23


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, William  Michael,  Kemp,  Sui  Juris,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without the "United States," that I am at least 18 years

of age,  a Citizen  of one  of the  United States of America, and

that I personally served the following document(s):

        NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
             Rule 201(d), Federal Rules of Evidence;
     Full Faith and Credit Clause;  P.L. 91-375, Section 403

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class U.S.  Mail, with  postage prepaid and properly addressed to

the following:


James E. Hedgspeth, Jr.       Clerk of Court
Etowah County Offices         Circuit Court of Etowah County
c/o 800 Forrest Avenue        c/o 800 Forrest Avenue
Gadsden [zip code exempt]     Gadsden [zip code exempt]
ALABAMA STATE                 ALABAMA STATE

Solicitor General             Clerk of Court
Department of Justice         Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
10th and Constitution, N.W.   c/o P.O. Box 301555
Washington [zip code exempt]  Montgomery [zip code exempt]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA          ALABAMA STATE

Attorney General              Clerk of Court
Department of Justice         District Court of the United States
10th and Constitution, N.W.   c/o 1729 Fifth Avenue North
Washington [zip code exempt]  Birmingham [zip code exempt]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA          ALABAMA STATE

Chief Judge                   William H. Rehnquist, C.J.
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Supreme Court of the United States
c/o 56 Forsyth Street, N.W.   1 First Street, N.E.
Atlanta [zip code exempt]     Washington [zip code exempt]
GEORGIA STATE                 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


Executed on ____________________________________

/s/ Mike Kemp

William Michael, Kemp, Sui Juris
Citizen of Alabama state


        Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 23 of 23


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Alabama v. Kemp