PUBLIC NOTICE TO COPYRIGHT VIOLATORS


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on July 21, 1998 at 19:37:12:

In Reply to: Re: PUBLIC NOTICE TO COPYRIGHT VIOLATORS posted by David C. Kaplowitz on July 21, 1998 at 19:17:46:

Dear David C. Kaplowitz:

Copies of "The Federal Zone" now extant on the
Internet were stolen, and then modified without
the author's permission and in violation of the
express restrictions clearly stated in the
Preface. The stated purpose of maintaining
the original character stream was to preserve
all bold, underlines, and italics as found
in the original files written by MS-WORD
Version 5.0B.

I regret to inform you that our budget simply
does not authorize us to do your homework for you.
We have done our diligent duty to provide violators
with proper and lawful notice of the violations.
This has already been enormously expensive for us,
thus adding to our actual and consequential damages.

We do regard these communications as strictly
confidential, and are carefully controlling
which candidate law firms are allowed to see
certain evidence of the many violations we have
now documented. Our task of screening law firms
involves private communications that are
protected by "attorney/client privileges."


We have updated the following paragraphs with
additional information:

Please review the electronic NOTICE AND DEMAND
which we transmitted to you and/or your company
several days ago. Please also see the InterNIC
WHOIS entry for the violating domain at URL:

http://rs.internic.net/cgi-bin/whois

for names of contacts responsible, in part,
for that domain.

Please also be informed of the following:

If A is pointing to stolen property on B's computer,
and B decides to move the stolen property without
telling A, then A is still pointing to stolen property,
even if the link is rendered invalid by such a move.

Moreover, the link to what was once a valid URL
provides valuable clues to locating the principal
infringer, who continues to violate the author's
exclusive copyrights with AOL's file servers,
and other file server(s) which remain active.

Similar links can be found in the index databases
of search engines commonly available on the Internet.
We regard such links as further evidence of direct
and indirect copyright infringements. You may
wish to instruct your technical staff to search
these index databases with those search engines.

If an Internet Service Provider fails to act,
after being informed of a copyright violation
using their computers, that ISP is liable for
contributory copyright infringement, and
possibly also direct copyright infringement.

Contributory copyright infringement is explained in the
industry standards now documented at the website of
Software Publishers Association (http://www.spa.org).

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. If criminal
violators feel "threatened" by imminent copyright
enforcement, that is a problem of their own making.

A lawful NOTICE AND DEMAND, to produce certified
evidence of the author's prior permission to
post all or part of "The Federal Zone" on the
Internet, is in no ways a "threat" [sic],
particularly when that permission was not given.

We intend to exhibit all offensive email to the
jury to be convened in this copyright matter.

If necessary, we will repeat this message.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Author of "The Federal Zone: Cracking the
Code of Internal Revenue" (all editions),
under a pen name

website: http://supremelaw.com/library


: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

: Dear sir:

: In regards to your letter (quoted below) you will notice that we are
: indeed, not hosting a stolen copy of the paper written. There is simply a
: link on our site to what might or might not be a stolen copy with or
: without the author's permission on a site named www.intac.com. We have no
: authority over the site www.intac.com, nor do we wish it. If you provide
: documentation that the copy at www.intac.com is indeed illegal, and you
: provide us with the appropriate place to point, we will be more than happy
: to have that page adjusted to point to an authorised copy.

: I would again state that there is no need for us to document holding a
: legal, illegal, stolen, not stolen, authorized or unauthorised copy of said
: document simply because we do not hold said document. If you have evidence
: otherwise please present it.

: I thank you for your considerations.

: Guild Second
: David C. Kaplowitz

: P.S. This document is signed by a PGP key. It is considered the equivelant
: of a legal signature. My public pgp key is available on the MIT pgp key
: server, as well as available via the finger protocol. Please make sure all
: future correspondences with me are also so signed, so I know the communique
: is indeed accurate, uncompromized, and legal.

: - -=> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell
: - -=>
: - -=> TO: Chief Executive Officer
: - -=> Internet Domain: HAVEN.ORG [sic]
: - -=> (no WHOIS address entry)
: - -=>
: - -=> email:
 (
: - -=>
: - -=> copy:
: - -=>
: - -=> FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
: - -=> Counselor at Law, Federal Witness
: - -=> and Private Attorney General
: - -=>
: - -=> DATE: July 11, 1998
: - -=>
: - -=> SUBJECT: Copyright Violation
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=> TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
: - -=>
: - -=> This is to inform you that we will soon complete
: - -=> our research in preparation for judicial enforcement
: - -=> of My exclusive copyrights in "The Federal Zone:
: - -=> Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue" (all editions).
: - -=>
: - -=> Formal NOTICE AND DEMAND are hereby served upon you
: - -=> to deliver a certified copy of the author's written
: - -=> authorization, permitting you to host a stolen
: - -=> electronic copy of "The Federal Zone: Cracking the
: - -=> Code of Internal Revenue" at Internet URL:
: - -=>
: - -=> http://www.haven.org/~dkap/generated_links_five.html
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=> The offending link is:
: - -=>
: - -=> http://www.intac.com/~dimitri/dh/fz/fedzone.html
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=> This certified copy must be delivered to:
: - -=>
: - -=> Supreme Law Firm
: - -=> c/o 2509 North Campbell Avenue, #1776
: - -=> Tucson 85719/tdc
: - -=> ARIZONA STATE
: - -=>
: - -=> no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 22, 1998
: - -=> (ten days hence).
: - -=>
: - -=> Beyond this deadline, your silence will activate
: - -=> estoppel, pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen, and
: - -=> constitute fraud, pursuant to U.S. v. Tweel.
: - -=> Court citations are available in Gilbertson's
: - -=> OPENING BRIEF in the Supreme Law Library.
: - -=>
: - -=> I am authorized to make this formal demand of you.
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=> Sincerely yours,
: - -=>
: - -=> /s/ Paul Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
: - -=>
: - -=> Counselor at Law, Federal Witness,
: - -=> Private Attorney General and Author
: - -=> (under a pen name)
: - -=>
: - -=> copies: litigation files (pending)
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=>
: - -=> _________________________________________________________
: - -=> DO YOU YAHOO!?
: - -=> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
: - -=>

: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
: Version: 2.6.2
: Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.3, an Emacs/PGP interface

: iQCVAwUBNaeqw4PYuF2Or0o1AQGQIAQAkqjdfbhkhgfeDVwEEt9EQtHRqJO7xw1a
: SaheW/WpfUrXF4wdK0NftdyNtcaQFsefzQSO2XAky0tmqXDmb0EfUJbuUOVK87Rd
: YMCU1nXRJqH0USIkWu5yMctWaVwUWCo70ntnSLG+fy1mEnZFXU++c4iwHXgR2j9w
: TE3Kqa0sR/8=
: =oHNl
: -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
: --
: I love California. I grew up in Phoenix.
: --Vice-President Dan Quayle
: --
: Pursuant to US Code Title 47, Ch 5, Subch 2, _227, unsolicited commercial
: Email received at this address is subject to a US$500 download and
: archival fee. By Emailing such, you agree to these terms.





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]