Posted by djf on September 15, 1998 at 18:00:08:
In Reply to: destruction of the Union states is a myth, easily exposed posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on September 15, 1998 at 13:08:33:
: : State sovereignty is not just an end in itself: -Rather, federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power.-
: : NY v. US 1992, please pay very careful attention, the court DOES NOT use words like 'sovereignty' LIGHTLY. It knows EXACTLY what it is saying when it says it. And to call anything 'sovereign' IS A RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN STATUS
: And, therefore, those who would argue that
: the Union states no longer exist, MUST, of
: necessity, admit that their destruction
: is an event which has already happened.
: If anyone can point to the exact historical
: event which destroyed all 50 Union states,
: I will show you, in that event, an act
: of blatant treason, punishable by death.
: It is an act ultra vires, to be sure.
: The destruction of the Union states,
: in this hypothetical scenario, must also
: have been intentional and premeditated,
: and not some historical accident.
: I find it unavoidable to conclude that
: their mythical destruction conforms
: precisely to the definition of treason
: the Framers intended.
: So, let it be known, to all apologists
: for treason: COME FORWARD AND IDENTIFY
: YOURSELVES, by name, telephone number,
: and Post Office location. But, I can
: understand completely why you might
: prefer to hide, behind phony titles
: and other misleading character strings.
: (CAPITAL LETTERS used here, because that is
: YOUR chosen mode of language.)
: There is no excuse, or defense, for treason.
: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
: Counselor at Law, Private Attorney General
I am in complete agreement. All public officials must take an oath to preserve, protect, and defend. Also, the Lawful Union COULD NOT be destroyed, Marbury V Madison says as much.
Post a Followup