Upshur...Re: Joseph Story's History of the Constitution


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by KatNip on October 04, 1998 at 00:15:28:

In Reply to: Joseph Story's History of the Constitution posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on October 03, 1998 at 20:35:19:

For an excellent critique of Story's History of
the Constitution, see:

Abel P. Upshur, The Federal Government: Its True
Nature and Character; Being a Review of Judge Story’s
Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States
(N.Y.: Van Evrie, Horton & Co., 1868).

: While you're cruising around in that great work,
: try to take notes when he writes about Article III.

: He was, evidently, of the opinion that this Article
: should be constructed to give Congress no discretion
: about establishing CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS, as we have
: already discussed in this forum.

: I am sure that others will very much appreciate
: what you may find, in Story's great opus.

: Please share your thoughts, and findings,
: with us, okay?

: Thanks!

:
: Sincerely yours,

: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]