[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Miken Powell on November 22, 1997 at 00:59:33:

In Reply to: Re: Deeds REPONSE posted by Two Cities on August 26, 1997 at 13:09:52:

: :
: : Hope nobody minds my deleting the original question for expediency:
: : 1) If you provide your e-mail address, I'll e-mail
: : you directly with the name of a fella out west
: : that deals with this type of info..he's super
: : busy but knows about all the de factor vs de jure
: : instruments dealing with "property."I hesitate
: : to put his phone number/address out on inet w/o
: : his permission, etc.

: : Also: Surely some of these groups that deal
: : with allodials/land patents and such would probably
: : know. Search on these topics and some of these
: : groups are bound to come up.

: : Ann

: The search was informative. Thanks.
: Municipalities are perhaps raising the land patent
: issues at time of incorporation, and at all times
: subsequent in the event of annexations, thereby
: establishing their PARAMOUNT interest in the land
: under their "jurisdiction".Any additional pointers
: are always welcome. A YES vote in an annexation
: election, is perhaps akin to a feudal oath of fealty.
: Does anyone know.

: Property transfers that do not transfer the interest in
: the land patent, such as warranty deeds, deeds of trust or
: other instruments may only transfer the illusion of
: color of title, keeping the patent holder as the
: true owner, and entitled to his fief.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]