Posted by Committee for Original Intent on December 31, 1997 at 00:25:38:
In Reply to: Re: Deeds REPONSE posted by Miken Powell on November 22, 1997 at 00:59:33:
: : :
: : : Hope nobody minds my deleting the original question for expediency:
: : : 1) If you provide your e-mail address, I'll e-mail
: : : you directly with the name of a fella out west
: : : that deals with this type of info..he's super
: : : busy but knows about all the de factor vs de jure
: : : instruments dealing with "property."I hesitate
: : : to put his phone number/address out on inet w/o
: : : his permission, etc.
: : : Also: Surely some of these groups that deal
: : : with allodials/land patents and such would probably
: : : know. Search on these topics and some of these
: : : groups are bound to come up.
: : : Ann
: : The search was informative. Thanks.
: : Municipalities are perhaps raising the land patent
: : issues at time of incorporation, and at all times
: : subsequent in the event of annexations, thereby
: : establishing their PARAMOUNT interest in the land
: : under their "jurisdiction".Any additional pointers
: : are always welcome. A YES vote in an annexation
: : election, is perhaps akin to a feudal oath of fealty.
: : Does anyone know.
: : Property transfers that do not transfer the interest in
: : the land patent, such as warranty deeds, deeds of trust or
: : other instruments may only transfer the illusion of
: : color of title, keeping the patent holder as the
: : true owner, and entitled to his fief.
I'm writing to you because I'm interested in your name. I know someone by your name -- don't think you could be the same person, but it's an unusual name, so maybe? Please respond and let's figure it out. Thanks.
Post a Followup