Posted by MARTIN on September 14, 1998 at 22:56:18:
In Reply to: Re: More Historical Evidence (legal ruse + deception) of 2 Classes of Citizens posted by Two Cities on September 14, 1998 at 11:58:27:
RE: My original entry preserved all spellings intact from the form.
Below the TITLE at the top; right?
And did this form use a roman calander date instead of Year of Our Lord?
Of course it did.
The title at the top of the form; was this title spelled in all uppercase or initialed as per a nom de guerre (name of war)?
RE: If the contractual process can work one way, can it not by : reciprocity work the other way.
You can go live like the old order Amish or Quaker anytime you want. Do not deal commerce, operate a motor vehicle upon a PUBLIC roadway or become employed. (Lots of choices right?)
Re: There were no upper-case "C" Citizens on the form.
Of course not and no one can take part in today's GOV. under His or Her "so-called Lawful" Christian name.
Who are you listening to?
There are no longer any States that were a party to the "We the People" constitution.
You only assume this.
Most lawyer and legislative tricks deal in grammer, misnomer and peoples assumption.
Like Bo Bo Gritz told the Freemen; "the law has changed."
Yes, Bo Bo knows the truth but he preached that the "Constitution" is Law the last I heard of him.
Pychological Operation most likely!
Post a Followup